Estimation of settlement below foundations and embankment fills is a routine geotechnical design requirement. A couple of settlement estimation methods are typically used for this purpose nationally and at WSDOT. These include the Hough and Schmertmann methods. This report provides a summary of these methods, and an assessment of their accuracy through comparison of predicted and measured settlement values. Based on long-term experience, it is usually assumed that settlement estimates are not reliable enough to predict settlements of less than 0.5 inch. The available data appear to support this in that the scatter in the measured settlement is greater than the settlement prediction for settlements of less than 0.5 inch. The scope of this research is limited to sandy WSDOT sites where settlement was measured (i.e., settlement in clay is not included). Measured settlements ranged from 0.5 inch to 40 inches. Overall, the Hough Method provided a more accurate prediction than did the Schmertmann Method.
Content Notes:
Accessibility note: This document has several screen reader accessibility issues. NTL staff remediated what they were able. The document is present as-is. Please contact NTL or the Washington DOT for further help.
In recent years, ADOT&PF personnel have used TEMP/W, a commercially available two-dimensional finite element program, to conduct thermal modeling of v...
In recent years, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (AK DOT&PF) personnel have used TEMP/W, a commercially available two-dimens...
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.