Knecht, W. R. (2015). Predicting Accident Rates from General Aviation Pilot Total Flight Hours (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-15/3). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57187
Knecht, William R.. Predicting Accident Rates from General Aviation Pilot Total Flight Hours. Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-15/3. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2015. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57187.
Knecht, William R. Predicting Accident Rates from General Aviation Pilot Total Flight Hours. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2015, Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-15/3, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57187.
In his 2001 book, The Killing Zone, Paul Craig presented evidence that general aviation (GA) pilot fatalities are related to relative flight experience (total flight hours, or TFH). We therefore ask if there is a range of TFH over which GA pilots are at greatest risk? More broadly, can we predict pilot accident rates, given TFH? Many researchers implicitly assume that GA accident rates are a linear function of TFH when, in fact, that relation appears nonlinear. This work explores the ability of a nonlinear gamma-based modeling function to predict GA accident rates from noisy TFH data (random sampling errors). Two sets of National Transportation Safety Board /Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) data, parsed by pilot instrument rating, produced weighted goodness-of-fit estimates of .654 and .775 for non-instrumentrated and instrument-rated pilots, respectively. This model class would be useful in direct prediction of GA accident rates and as a statistical covariate to factor in flight risk during other types of modeling. Applied to FAA data, these models show that the range for relatively high risk may be far broader than first imagined, and may extend well beyond the 2,000-hour mark before leveling off to a baseline rate.
Knecht, W. R. (2015). Predicting Accident Rates from General Aviation Pilot Total Flight Hours (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-15/3). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57187
Knecht, William R.. Predicting Accident Rates from General Aviation Pilot Total Flight Hours. Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-15/3. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2015. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57187.
Knecht, William R. Predicting Accident Rates from General Aviation Pilot Total Flight Hours. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2015, Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-15/3, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57187.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.