Williams, C. A., & King, R. E. (2010). The Effects of Testing Circumstance and Education Level on MMPI-2 Correction Scale Scores (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-10/3). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57098
Williams, Clara A. and Raymond E. King. The Effects of Testing Circumstance and Education Level on MMPI-2 Correction Scale Scores. Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-10/3. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2010. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57098.
Williams, Clara A., and Raymond E. King The Effects of Testing Circumstance and Education Level on MMPI-2 Correction Scale Scores. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2010, Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-10/3, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57098.
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) is used by the Federal Aviation Administration to assess psychopathology in air traffic control specialist applicants after a conditional offer of employment is extended. Two groups are compared in this study on their level of Scale K, which is used as a measure of defensiveness (putting one’s best foot forward – “faking good”), but which may be influenced by socioeconomic status and education. Group 1 had already been hired and took the MMPI-2 as part of a voluntary research protocol while in training. Group 2 took the MMPI-2 as part of their medical screening process for hiring. There was a significant difference between the two groups (2 indicated a higher level of K than 1) on the level of K, suggesting that K is likely measuring defensiveness. Group 1 faced no consequences for their results, while Group 2 faced potential additional psychological assessment as a consequence of their MMPI-2 performance, and possibly even ultimate medical disqualification. While the hypothesis that groups would differ on K as a function of testing circumstances was supported, the hypothesis that K would rise as a function of education was not.
Williams, C. A., & King, R. E. (2010). The Effects of Testing Circumstance and Education Level on MMPI-2 Correction Scale Scores (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-10/3). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57098
Williams, Clara A. and Raymond E. King. The Effects of Testing Circumstance and Education Level on MMPI-2 Correction Scale Scores. Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-10/3. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2010. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57098.
Williams, Clara A., and Raymond E. King The Effects of Testing Circumstance and Education Level on MMPI-2 Correction Scale Scores. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2010, Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-10/3, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57098.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.