Techno-Economic Analysis of Implementing Hybrid Electric Utility Vehicles in Municipal Fleets

Details

• Creators:
  Northrop, Will ; Zarling, Darrick ; Haag, Shawn
• Corporate Creators:
  University of Minnesota. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
• Corporate Contributors:
  Minnesota. Department of Transportation. Office of Research & Innovation
• Subject/TRT Terms:
  Alternatives Analysis Economic Analysis Economic Towns Engine Idling Fuel Conservation Hybrid Vehicles Pickup Trucks Power Trains Simulation Technology Assessment Utility Vehicles Vehicle Fleets

  More +
• Publication/ Report Number:
  MN 2020-25
• Resource Type:
  Tech Report
• Geographical Coverage:
  Minnesota ; United States
• Edition:
  Final Report 2020-25
• Corporate Publisher:
  Minnesota. Department of Transportation
• Abstract:
  This research quantified fuel economy improvements by implementing hybrid electric utility vehicles in municipal fleets. The research team analyzed utility vehicle data and built computer vehicle simulations of utility trucks with three powertrain types: conventional, charge sustaining hybrid, and charge depleting hybrid plug-in hybrid vehicle (PHEV). Driving cycles were recorded from three vehicle groups, ¾-ton pickup trucks, ½-ton pickup trucks, and SUVs using portable onboard diagnostics loggers. Collected data were used in vehicle simulations to determine the fuel economy improvement possible when implementing hybrid powertrain architectures in municipal fleets. The magnitude of benefits from implementing hybrid vehicles was highly dependent on driving cycles and the electric motor/battery combination of the PHEV. The highest kinetic intensity (KI) values, representing urban driving, were found to lead to the greatest fuel economy improvements for hybrid vehicles over conventionally powered vehicles. The results depended heavily on the electric motor/battery combination, with the higher battery capacity plug-in hybrid vehicles yielding the highest levels of fuel economy improvement. It is recommended that fleets consider driving cycle as the primary factor for determining the economic benefits of purchasing alternative powertrain vehicles. Hybrid vehicles should be placed on routes that are more urban, while rural/highway routes would be better served by conventionally powered vehicles. Idling time was also calculated for all the drive cycles and needs to be separately accounted for when analyzing driving cycle data. Idling for over 50% of the driving cycle can lead to about a 10% reduction in fuel economy based on the modeling conducted for ¾ ton pickup trucks in this study. The research team further recommends that aggressive driving be reduced as it will negate the fuel economy advantages possible from hybrid powertrain architectures.
• Format:
  PDF
• Funding:
  (C)1003325 (WO) 72
• Collection(s):
  US Transportation Collection
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha256:551686aa5c3707ad46aab63ac8417d27befba4204fb7e77cc1af881d4845053c
• Download URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/53977/dot_53977_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 1.83 MB ]