Waterproofing Options for Bridge Decks

Wells, Danny; Palle, Sudhir; Hopwood II, Theodore; University of Kentucky Transportation Center

doi:10.13023/ktc.rr.2019.39

Advanced Search

Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

Advanced Search
Custom Query

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Waterproofing Options for Bridge Decks

2018-09-01
By Wells, Danny ; Palle, Sudhir ; Hopwood II, Theodore

[PDF-1.57 MB]

English

Details You May Also Like

Details:

Creators:

Wells, Danny ; Palle, Sudhir ; Hopwood II, Theodore

Wells, Danny ; Palle, Sudhir ; Hopwood II, Theodore Less -
Corporate Creators:

University of Kentucky Transportation Center
Corporate Contributors:

Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
Subject/TRT Terms:

[+]

Bridge Decks Chlorides Concrete Impervious Membranes Membranes Waterproofing
Publication/ Report Number:

KTC-19-39/SPR17-531-1F
DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13023/ktc.rr.2019.39
Resource Type:

Tech Report
Geographical Coverage:

Kentucky ; United States

Kentucky ; United States Less -
Edition:

Final
Corporate Publisher:

University of Kentucky Transportation Center
Abstract:

Due to the increasing use of deicing chemicals and the subsequent intrusion of chlorides into bridge decks, it is necessary to expand the use of available protective measures, including waterproofing materials. Waterproofing options that fall into three categories; 1) membranes (liquid and sheet systems), 2) friction polymers (laminates), and 3) polymer asphalts. This study assessed the waterproofing characteristics of these products. Prior to this study, no common test had been established to compare the performance of waterproofing products. A test method was developed that closely follows ASTM D5084, “Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter,” for this purpose. This test provided valid information to compare performance of waterproofing options.
Format:

PDF
Funding:

SPR 17-531
Collection(s):

US Transportation Collection
Main Document Checksum:

[+]

urn:sha256:9258b460cc4fe58b652d15f833c2c38bfcf9ab7f3cf325eeecb6fa212e195981
Download URL:

https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/44133/dot_44133_DS1.pdf
File Type:

No Additional Files

More +

Waterproofing Options for Bridge Decks

Details:

Supporting Files

You May Also Like