United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety (2016). Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool Supplemental Case Studies (Report No. FHWA-SA-17-002). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42851
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety. Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool Supplemental Case Studies. Report no. FHWA-SA-17-002. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42851.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool Supplemental Case Studies. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, 2016, Report no. FHWA-SA-17-002, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42851.
FHWA published the Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool (Systemic Tool) in 2013 and, given the condition of the practice at that time, most discussion and examples were based on rural applications and were located along a system with strong supporting data for crashes and road system characteristics. Since publication of the original Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool (FHWA, 2013), additional systemic analyses have indicated the systemic process can be successfully applied in urban areas and along systems with little supporting data. This supplement to the Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool provides two additional case studies demonstrating the systemic analysis process. One case study demonstrates how State, county, and local government agencies in Minnesota evaluated pedestrian and bicycle safety issues in urban areas and developed a program to address these issues based on risk. The second case study illustrates how North Dakota conducted a systemic analysis with little supporting data initially available for analysis.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety (2016). Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool Supplemental Case Studies (Report No. FHWA-SA-17-002). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42851
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety. Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool Supplemental Case Studies. Report no. FHWA-SA-17-002. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42851.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool Supplemental Case Studies. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, 2016, Report no. FHWA-SA-17-002, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42851.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.