Bituminous Overlay Policy: A Performance Evaluation
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Bituminous Overlay Policy: A Performance Evaluation

Filetype[PDF-1.65 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    To address an increasing backlog of roadways in need of rehabilitation, the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) began use of a standard overlay thickness policy in the early 1980s. On the non-interstate, or primary, system, first resurfacings or overlays over pavements being widened and resurfaced were allowed 2.5 in. (6.35 cm). Subsequent resurfacings were limited to 2 in. (5.08 cm). A provision in the policy allowed for exceptions. This report presents the results of an evaluation of the performance of bituminous overlays constructed on the primary system in accordance with IDOT's overlay policy. Twelve projects were selected for monitoring. The results of visual surveys, deflection testing, and Condition Rating Survey (CRS) histories were analyzed. The standard overlay thickness policy met the FHWA-required minimum 5-year performance period for Federal-aid rehabilitation projects on the primary system. Subsequent overlays were found to have shorter life spans than first overlays. Records of requests for exceptions to the standard overlay thickness policy were also reviewed. Information gathered from the records review was incorporated into the policy and used to create a more efficient process for reviewing requests for exceptions.
  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov