QuickZone: Case Study Snapshot #3: Responding to Public Concern about Delays during Bridge Repairs
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

QuickZone: Case Study Snapshot #3: Responding to Public Concern about Delays during Bridge Repairs

Filetype[PDF-804.99 KB]


  • English
    • Details You May Also Like

    Details:

    • Corporate Creators:
      United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations Research and Development
    • Contributors:
    • Corporate Contributors:
      Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center
    • Subject/TRT Terms:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
      FHWA-HRT-05-144
    • Resource Type:
      Tech Report
    • Geographical Coverage:
      United States
    • Corporate Publisher:
      United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations Research and Development
    • Abstract:
      In the spring of 2001, a major structural rehabilitation project started on the Little Bras d’Or bridge in Nova Scotia, Canada. Built in 1959, the bridge consists of 1.2 meter by 30.4 meter (4 feet by 100 feet) steel girder spans and carries a two-lane, twoway highway. It was necessary to close one lane to perform repairs. Traffic flow was controlled by signals, and later, during peak traffic flow hours, by flaggers. As the project progressed into late spring, traffic volumes increased and motorists began to experience significant delays. Local residents, businesses, politicians, and emergency services were very vocal about the delays. Political pressure forced rescheduling the work for November of that year. In anticipation of the November bridge work, the Province’s transportation engineer started looking for tools to help predict the impact of the proposed closure to make objective decisions on when work could take place. QuickZone was used to analyze various staging scenarios. First, a baseline model was validated for queues and delays observed during the spring 2001 roadwork. QuickZone demonstrated that the planned move to November using the same traffic control would still result in unacceptable delays. Due to the QuickZone analysis and political issues, project completion was further delayed. Basic repairs were made to keep the bridge safely open until a better traffic control solution could be identified. In 2004, the initial analysis performed at this site was updated for a milling and repaving project on the same section of the highway. Estimates of capacity loss were updated based upon observations made at other sites. QuickZone was used to support the decision to do the work at night and also to define allowable nighttime work hours. It is anticipated that the structural repairs started in 2001 will resume and be completed in 2005 using an alternative traffic control plan.
    • Format:
      PDF
    • Alternate URL:
    • Collection(s):
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • Download URL:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26