U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Pavement Smoothness Index Relationships, Final Report

File Language:
English


Details

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
    Applied Research Associates. ERES Division
  • Contributors:
    Swanlund, Mark
  • Corporate Contributors:
    United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Pavement Technology
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    FHWA-RD-02-057
  • Resource Type:
    Tech Report
  • Geographical Coverage:
    United States
  • Contracting Officer:
    Swanlund, Mark
  • Corporate Publisher:
    United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Pavement Technology
  • Abstract:
    Nearly all State highway agencies use smoothness specifications to ensure that hot-mix asphalt (HMA) and Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements are built to high levels of smoothness. Not only is an initially smooth pavement generally indicative of quality workmanship, but it has been shown to last longer than a pavement built rougher.

    About half of all current State smoothness specifications for HMA and more than three-fourths of all current PCC smoothness specifications are centered around the Profile Index (PI), as often measured using a profilograph. The vast majority of these specifications utilize a 5-mm (0.2-inch) blanking band in computing PI (i.e., PI5-mm). Unfortunately, because of the technical limitations of the profilograph equipment and PI computation procedures, the adequacy of PI5-mm in characterizing roughness and having it relate to user response has come into question.

    The International Roughness Index (IRI) or the Profile Index using a 0.0-mm blanking band (PI0.0) seem to provide better measures of smoothness and better correlation with user response. However, one barrier to more widespread implementation of these new smoothness standards is the lack of objective, verifiable correlation methods for use in establishing specification limits using the IRI or PI0.0. Assistance in selecting appropriate IRI and PI0.0 specification limits is needed to provide a basis for modifying current specifications to these more reproducible and portable smoothness indices.

    This research effort has developed a series of relationships between IRI and PI that can assist States in transitioning to an IRI or PI0.0 smoothness specification for HMA and PCC pavements.

  • Format:
    PDF
  • Funding:
    GS-10F-0298K
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:a55113105b8528ef50fb153efd8fc375ea565de33f919d040d7ebe1a9d7ac0d23e96b647fb4839c17bc2202e901d4010230017fe665717143d3884bc20c8b9e6
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 7.31 MB ]
PREVIOUS
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
Details
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
BACK TO TOP