Peer exchange : final report, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, September-October 2003
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Peer exchange : final report, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, September-October 2003

Filetype[PDF-336.48 KB]


English
Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Corporate Creators:
    Louisiana Transportation Research Center
  • Corporate Contributors:
    United States. Federal Highway Administration
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Resource Type:
    Policy Statement
  • Geographical Coverage:
    United States
  • TRIS Online Accession Number:
    1493971
  • Corporate Publisher:
    Louisiana Transportation Research Center
  • Abstract:
    Federal regulations (23 CFR 420 Subpart B) require that each state must agree to peer reviews of it’s Research, Development, and Technology Transfer management process to be eligible for managing State Planning and Research (SP&R) funds. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) interpreted the peer meetings to be more of an exchange of information regarding the various practices used by states to manage their RD&T2 programs. The intent was to strengthen weak programs and enhance strong programs with a sharing of ideas. The peer exchange teams are typically composed of state research managers, FHWA, university or industry personnel, at least two of which must have received training provided by FHWA and are maintained on a list of qualified peer exchange team members. Peer exchanges are generally conducted in an informal atmosphere and last 2-4 days. Techniques used to gather information include discussion of individual state practices, informal interviews with users of the RD&T2 products and brainstorming sessions on the focus areas of interest to the host state. Open ended questions are used during the interview sessions to solicit the strengths and weaknesses of the program form the user’s perspective.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov