Rajagopal, A. (2006). A Comparison of Optical Gradation Analysis Devices to Current Test Methods - Phase 1: Executive Summary Report (Report No. FHWA/OH-2006/23). Ohio. Dept. of Transportation. Office of Research and Development. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37639
Rajagopal, Arudi. A Comparison of Optical Gradation Analysis Devices to Current Test Methods - Phase 1: Executive Summary Report. Report no. FHWA/OH-2006/23. Ohio. Dept. of Transportation. Office of Research and Development, 2006. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37639.
Rajagopal, Arudi A Comparison of Optical Gradation Analysis Devices to Current Test Methods - Phase 1: Executive Summary Report. Ohio. Dept. of Transportation. Office of Research and Development, 2006, Report no. FHWA/OH-2006/23, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37639.
The specific objectives of the study are to: 1. Conduct a review and evaluation of available optical gradation analysis devices that are in use and/or being investigated by other agencies. 2. Prepare physical samples and conduct gradation tests on a range of aggregate samples using current ASTM/AASHTO procedures. 3. Repeat tests on physical samples using the optical devices that become available to the researchers. 4. Analyze the data. 5. Identify the specific tasks Phase-2 evaluation for a comprehensive evaluation of optical devices. First, a review of available optical devices was conducted. An optical device called Computerized Particle Analyzer (CPA) was selected for laboratory evaluation to determine its suitability for gradation analysis. This device has been designed to examine particles as they freely fall in front of a light source, while a sophisticated camera capable of making 10,000 scans per second captures images.
Rajagopal, A. (2006). A Comparison of Optical Gradation Analysis Devices to Current Test Methods - Phase 1: Executive Summary Report (Report No. FHWA/OH-2006/23). Ohio. Dept. of Transportation. Office of Research and Development. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37639
Rajagopal, Arudi. A Comparison of Optical Gradation Analysis Devices to Current Test Methods - Phase 1: Executive Summary Report. Report no. FHWA/OH-2006/23. Ohio. Dept. of Transportation. Office of Research and Development, 2006. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37639.
Rajagopal, Arudi A Comparison of Optical Gradation Analysis Devices to Current Test Methods - Phase 1: Executive Summary Report. Ohio. Dept. of Transportation. Office of Research and Development, 2006, Report no. FHWA/OH-2006/23, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37639.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.