Traffic control device conspicuity.

Inman, Vaughan W.; Balk, Stacy A.; Perez, William A.; Science Applications International Corporation

Advanced Search

Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

Advanced Search
Custom Query

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Traffic control device conspicuity.

2013-08-01
By Inman, Vaughan W. ; Balk, Stacy A. ; Perez, William A.

[PDF-1.78 MB]

English

Details You May Also Like

Details:

Creators:

Inman, Vaughan W. ; Balk, Stacy A. ; Perez, William A.

Inman, Vaughan W. ; Balk, Stacy A. ; Perez, William A. Less -
Corporate Creators:

Science Applications International Corporation
Corporate Contributors:

United States. Federal Highway Administration
Subject/TRT Terms:

[+]

Conspicuity Eye Movements Eye Tracking Regulatory Signs Sign Detection Sign Recall Speed-limit Signs Speed Signs Stop Signs Traffic Control Devices Traffic Signs Visibility Warning Signs
Publication/ Report Number:

FHWA-HRT-13-044
Resource Type:

Tech Report
Geographical Coverage:

United States
Corporate Publisher:

United States. Federal Highway Administration
Abstract:

The conspicuity of a traffic control device (TCD) is defined as the probability that the device will be noticed. However, there is no agreed-upon measure of what constitutes being noticed. Various measures have been suggested, including eye fixations, recall, and verbal reports. Four conspicuity studies are discussed in this report.

It has been observed that conspicuity is not solely a property of a TCD but must include consideration of the surrounding environment. The first of the studies described in this report used multidimensional scaling (MDS) to identify factors that characterize drivers’ perceptions of TCD environments. The MDS study revealed that two dimensions, clutter and predictability, characterized the roadway environments included in the study.

In the second study, drivers’ eye glances to TCDs were recorded on a 34-mi (55-km) drive. After passing selected TCDs, drivers’ recall of the TCD was assessed by asking them to identify it. That study showed that warning signs are seldom glanced at and only about half of them are recalled just 2 s after they are passed. About 20 percent of speed limit signs received glances, but drivers were aware of the posted speed limit about 80 percent of the time.

The third study examined drivers’ ability to detect speed limit and warning signs. The ability to detect speed limit signs, as measured by conspicuity angle, was degraded by cluttered backgrounds. However, the detectability of fluorescent yellow-green warning signs was not affected by background clutter.

The fourth study examined the effect of background environment on drivers’ ability to read TCDs. Background had no effect on speed limit sign readability and had a small effect on warning sign readability. Recommendations for enhancing the conspicuity of regulatory signs are proposed.
Format:

PDF
Funding:

DTFH61-08-C-00006
Collection(s):

Federal Highway Administration
Main Document Checksum:

[+]

urn:sha256:9c9efee76aa7a8422b53c7366e258208c4ccb386ceacc0449716ed0a1f49299d
Download URL:

https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/35946/dot_35946_DS1.pdf
File Type:

No Additional Files

More +

Traffic control device conspicuity.

Details:

Supporting Files

You May Also Like