Cargo liability regimes
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Cargo liability regimes

Filetype[PDF-289.10 KB]


  • English
    • Details You May Also Like

    Details:

    • Creators:
      Clarke, Roger
    • Subject/TRT Terms:
    • Resource Type:
      Research Paper
    • Corporate Publisher:
      Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-MARINE/WATERWAYS TRANSPORTATION-Marine Laws and RegulationsNTL-MARINE/WATERWAYS TRANSPORTATION-Marine Economics and Finance
    • Abstract:
      There are at present at least three international regimes of maritime cargo liability in force in different countries of the world - the original Hague rules (1924), the updated version known as the Hague-Visby rules (1968, further amended 1979), and the Hamburg rules (1978).There is, however, considerable dissatisfaction with each of these regimes - with Hague and Hague-Visby because they are often seen as in need of modernization and as too restricted in scope, and with all three because of disagreements over the substance. The report gives main features of a cargo liability regime covering sea transport. It then notes the main areas in which the principal current regimes differ between themselves or deal with cargo liability less than comprehensively. It finally gives a qualitative analysis of items where there is disagreement, and possible compromise formulations that could form the basis of a widely acceptable set of Common Rules. Appendices, tables, 57 p.
    • Format:
      PDF
    • Collection(s):
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • Download URL:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.23