Construction of bridge decks with precast prestressed deck planks
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Construction of bridge decks with precast prestressed deck planks

Filetype[PDF-1.49 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Abstract:
    The purpose of this paper is to discuss the construction and early performance of two 1999 ? 2000 bridge deck replacement state contracts in Illinois that included precast, prestressed concrete (PPC) deck planks. Metal stay-in-place forms used in one of the contracts will also be briefly addressed in this report.

    In 1997, the department and the prestress industry agreed to construct a few demonstration projects. The following year, the department began looking for some bridge projects that would be good candidates for

    incorporating PPC deck planks. In 1999 ? 2000, two state-funded projects with a total of three bridges were constructed with PPC deck planks. The two PPC bridge deck projects were constructed as a deciding factor on lifting the moratorium on PPC deck planks. For these projects, the thickness of the planks was increased to 3.0 or 3.5 inches, instead of the 2.5-inch planks used in the past. The maturity of the planks was required to be a minimum of 60 days at the time of the deck pour. The seating method for the 1999 ? 2000 PPC planks included pre-installing leveling screws for filet adjustment and using polystyrene forms to contain the concrete between the planks.

    The construction and early performance of the two PPC bridge deck projects was evaluated. This report includes several conclusions and recommendations based on the findings.

  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov