Coast Guard : actions needed to mitigate deepwater project risks
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Coast Guard : actions needed to mitigate deepwater project risks

Filetype[PDF-163.00 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The Deepwater Capability Replacement Project was initiated by the Coast Guard to replace and modernize its aging fleet of over 90 cutters and 200 aircraft used beyond 50 miles from shore. This project, the largest acquisition ever attempted by the Coast Guard, will likely cost over $10 billion or more and will not be completed for 2 to 3 decades. Already, the Coast Guard has spent about $116 million on the project?s design, and this year is asking for $338 million to begin the acquisition phase. The Congress and the Coast Guard are now at a major crossroads with the Deepwater Project, in that the planning is essentially complete, and the Congress is now being asked to commit to a multibillion dollar project that will define the way the Coast Guard performs many of its missions for decades to come. The acquisition strategy the Coast Guard has chosen for the Deepwater Project is unique and untried for a project of this magnitude. It carries many risks that could potentially cause significant schedule delays and cost increases. Since 1998, we have reviewed numerous aspects of this project at the request of this Subcommittee and others. Most recently, we evaluated the major risks

      associated with the project, and our testimony today is based on a report released earlier this week. We will discuss risks the project faces in four major areas: (1) planning the project around annual funding levels far above what the administration has told the Coast Guard it can expect to receive, (2) keeping costs under control in the contract?s later years, (3) ensuring that procedures and personnel are in place for managing and overseeing the contractor once the contract is awarded, and (4) minimizing potential problems with developing

      unproven technology.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26