A Comparison of Pressure Treated Wood and Cedar Signposts: Final Reports
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


A Comparison of Pressure Treated Wood and Cedar Signposts: Final Reports

Filetype[PDF-709.34 KB]

  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • TRIS Online Accession Number:
    • OCLC Number:
    • Edition:
      Final Report 1999
    • Abstract:
      This report compares the use of pressure treated wood and cedar for signposts. Both materials are being used by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), however sign crews are now primarily using Port Orford cedar posts. There are two types of pressure treated posts used by ODOT, Douglas-fir treated with Ammoniacal Copper Zinc Arsenate (ACZA) and Hem-fir treated with Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA). There are environmental concerns about the use of pressure treated wood. However, studies cited in this report have shown it is not detrimental to the environment. Based on price data provided by pressure treated wood suppliers, the purchase price for ACZA treated Douglas-fir is slightly higher than Port Orford cedar. The average disposal cost for pressure treated wood based on disposal at a landfill or waste transfer facility is slightly higher than cedar. In actual practice, sign crews dispose Port Orford cedar wastes in existing waste containers, thus eliminating the added disposal fee incurred by taking it directly to a landfill or waste transfer facility. In a survey of ODOT sign crews, they unanimously favor using Port Orford cedar posts over pressure treated posts. In Oregon State University?s wood post studies, Port Orford cedar posts lasted an average of 20 years, whereas pressure treated wood posts remained in service one-and-a-half to three times longer than Port Orford cedar. ODOT sign crews assert that only a small number of posts are replaced because of rotting, indicating a 20 year life is adequate for a signpost.
    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.23