An analysis of the benefits of using underground tanks for the storage of stormwater runoff generated at Virginia Department of Transportation maintenance facilities.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

An analysis of the benefits of using underground tanks for the storage of stormwater runoff generated at Virginia Department of Transportation maintenance facilities.

Filetype[PDF-746.78 KB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) collects millions of gallons of runoff at its nearly 300 salt storage

    facilities each year, with some portion of this water being reused for the generation of salt brine. Storing this collected stormwater

    runoff in tanks rather than ponds affords some advantages in that less water is collected; the water that is collected remains

    cleaner; and the water is more likely to be properly managed and disposed of when necessary.

    The purpose of this study was to quantify the monetary benefits of using underground storage tanks for the temporary

    storage of salt-laden runoff generated at VDOT’s salt storage facilities. This was done by way of a simple cost analysis

    comparing the use of underground storage tanks to the open-pond systems more commonly used now. Information on the costs

    related to the purchase, construction, maintenance, and operation of both storage types was used to develop a simple cost

    estimation tool, i.e., a benefit/cost spreadsheet. The tool was structured so that modifications could be made based on sitespecific

    information on precipitation, water disposal costs, brine usage, etc.

    The study concluded that although the purchase price of underground storage tanks is substantially higher than that of

    ponds, the 50-year all-inclusive cost of tanks is similar to the cost of ponds for stormwater storage. Although the costs are highly

    variable and dependent on site-specific conditions, when the medium default values used in the benefit/cost spreadsheet are used,

    tanks are slightly cheaper than pond relining or new pond construction. As disposal costs increase above current values, storage

    by way of tanks will become an increasingly better option.

    Based on this information, the study recommends that VDOT’s Environmental Division collaborate with the Capital

    Outlay Section of VDOT’s Administrative Services Division, residency administrators, and area headquarters superintendents to

    evaluate the option of using underground storage tanks for the storage of stormwater runoff from salt loading pads at locations

    that are replacing (relining) existing ponds or at facilities where new pond construction is being considered.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov