Cement stabilization of unpaved roads.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Cement stabilization of unpaved roads.

Filetype[PDF-2.47 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    In an effort to address the local citizens’ preference for preserving existing gravel roads, personnel of the Northern

    Virginia District of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) have been exploring various options for improving the

    effectiveness of current maintenance practices. The purpose of this study was to explore the effectiveness of chemical

    stabilization practices on unpaved roads. A 550-ft-long segment of Hurley Lane, a gravel road in Loudoun County, was selected

    for testing. Traffic counts measured by VDOT personnel in early 2016 indicated approximately 340 vehicles per day, including

    3% trucks.

    The construction technique known as full-depth reclamation (FDR) was used. The existing unpaved road section was

    pulverized to a depth of 12 in and subsequently blended with 5% cement by weight using road reclaiming equipment. The

    surface was then covered with a double chip seal. The main objective of this project was to provide stability while still

    maintaining the appearance and “feel” of a gravel road.

    Construction was completed in mid-November 2015, and problems with surface durability became evident

    approximately 3 months later. Excessive rutting and soil contamination at the surface were observed. Follow-up field testing

    was conducted to determine the cause of failure. A falling weight deflectometer was used to measure the response of the road

    section to impulse loads. Test results and visual observation indicated that the lack of durability of the chip seal was the most

    likely cause of substandard performance. Prior to stabilization, the test section at Hurley Lane required frequent maintenance

    activities. The need for extensive road maintenance decreased substantially after completion of the project, indicating that the

    underlying cement-stabilized road section was performing adequately.

    The study concluded that cement stabilization using the FDR approach is a viable option for improving some unpaved

    roads. It can be particularly attractive in situations where placement of conventional cement-treated aggregate is impractical

    because of time constraints on delivery.

    The study recommends that VDOT consider using FDR with chip seal surfacing for maintenance of areas identified as

    maintenance nuisance (each road segment under 0.1 mile long) and for roads qualified under the Rural Rustic Road Program

    (designed to keep a traditional rural lane appearance while improving the riding surface within the current right of way). FDR

    projects need to be planned adequately and monitored during construction. Particular attention should be directed to field testing

    of compaction, weather-related limitations on construction activities, and chip seal application procedures. The study also

    recommends the use of a falling weight deflectometer to prioritize maintenance needs.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov