United States Department of Transportation
i
Estimating walking and bicycling at the state level.
-
2017-03-01
[PDF-3.17 MB]
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Edition:Final report
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:Estimates of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) drive policy and planning decisions for surface transportation. No similar
metric is computed for cycling and walking. What approaches could be used to compute such a metric on the state
level? This report discusses three such approaches, identifies the advantages and disadvantages of each, and applies
them to Washington State. The first approach employs travel survey data. The second approach is sample-based using
pedestrian and bicycle count data. The third approach is an aggregate demand model approach using demographic data
combined with count data. Due to data limitations, none of these methods could be properly implemented on the
statewide level. Despite the data limits, the methods were implemented for one county (King County) in order to
compare findings. The travel survey method estimated the lowest bicycle and pedestrian miles traveled (BMT and
PMT), and the sample-based method estimated the highest. The travel survey method is useful for a statewide measure,
but it does not provide the detail needed for facility-level estimates. For bicyclists, the sample-based method is
appropriate if volumes are desired at the facility level. For pedestrians, the aggregate model might be more appropriate,
because of the more dispersed nature of pedestrian travel. Each method has strengths and weaknesses, and each helps
us understand bicycle and pedestrian travel in different ways.
For this reason, the project team recommends improving both statewide travel survey data and pedestrian and cyclist
traffic count data which feed these methods. Travel survey data should be collected statewide with oversampling for
non-motorized travelers. Pedestrian and cyclist traffic counts should be expanded to include a continuous counting
program in addition to the short-duration count program. After the continuous count program is in place, short-duration
counts should be chosen using a stratified random sampling approach. For example, the sampling frame could consist
of all road and path segments in the state divided by region (Coast Range, Puget Lowland, Cascades, Eastern
Washington), by urbanity (rural, urban), by facility type (highways/arterials, local/collector roads, paths), and by
whether the location is on a bridge or not. To increase sites sampled, the short-duration count program could also be
rotated, with each location being counted every three years instead of every year. Better data will allow the state to
quantify bicycling and walking at both the state level and facility level to inform decision-making, facility design and
planning, and safety analysis.
-
Format:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
