Shear design expressions for concrete filled steel tube and reinforced concrete filled tube components.
-
2016-06-01
Details
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:Concrete-filled steel tubes (CFSTs) and reinforced concrete-filled steel tubes (RCFSTs) are increasingly ; used in transportation structures as piers, piles, caissons or other foundation components. While the axial ; and flexural properties of CFTs have been well researched, research on their shear resistance is lacking. ; Currently accepted methods for calculating the shear capacity of CFSTs and RCFTs are adapted from ; shear strength equations used for structural steel or reinforced concrete components. Though, it is ; expected that CFSTs would retain the full shear capacity of the steel without local buckling of the ; section. In addition, because circular CFSTs provide optimum confinement to the concrete core, it is also ; expected that the full shear strength of plain or longitudinally reinforced concrete can also be developed. ; Since no equation currently accounts for both, it is probable that they significantly underestimate the ; effectiveness of the composite section, potentially increasing undesirable conservatism and cost. ; However, without experimental data to validate the design expressions, it is not possible to modify them. ; The research program described herein experimentally investigated the shear resistance and deformation ; of CFST and RCFST members with an eye towards developing an improved and more accurate shear ; strength expression. The experimental study included 22 large-scale CFTs subjected to four-point ; bending. The study parameters included: (1) the aspect ratio (a/D where a is the clear span from the point ; of loading to the point of support and D is the tube diameter), (2) concrete strength, (3) D/t (where t is ; the thickness of the steel tube), (4) interface condition (greased or contaminated with soil), (5) infill type ; (concrete or gravel), (6) internal reinforcement ratio, and (6) length of the tube beyond the support (tail ; length). The results indicate that the shear strength of CFSTs and RCFSTs is on average 2 times the ; current WSDOT expression. This new design expression for shear resistance has been proposed for ; implementation in the WSDOT Bridge Design Manual (BDM).
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:cd5bee2284d88e95d9f796571aefe61e8577b9dfccc33d462ca0a685cff89e84