United States Department of Transportation
i
Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of illumination as a safety treatment at rural intersections.
-
2016-09-01
-
[PDF-1.21 MB]
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:This research study seeks to improve current understanding of the relationship between rural intersection safety and different illumination levels. It uses three parallel studies: a survey of rural intersection illumination practices among US state departments of transportation (DOTs), a safety analysis of rural intersection illumination, and a benefit-to-cost analysis of rural intersection illumination. These parallel studies indicate the following:
(a) Most DOTs do not consider cost-effectiveness in rural intersection illumination projects.
(b) There is little or no benefit to rural intersection illumination beyond a threshold of 12 lux.
(c) Illuminance levels lower than the minimum recommended value or 8 lux could provide significant safety benefit.
(d) Any rural intersection that does not require electrification would be cost-effective for illuminances not exceeding 12 lux. The cost-effectiveness of other intersections must be determined based on overall costs, AADT, crash rate, and a target benefit-to-cost ratio that signifies the DOT’s required level of cost-effectiveness.
This research study provides a companion benefit-to-cost spreadsheet model to facilitate tradeoff analysis by DOTs.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
