operations at two-way long temporary work zones.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

operations at two-way long temporary work zones.

Filetype[PDF-3.98 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the use of Portable Traffic Signal (PTS) systems at long, rural

      two-lane work zones and to compare three different conditions for controlling one-lane traffic in conjunction with pilot car

      operations: flagging only, a PTS system with the presence of a flagger, and a PTS system without the presence of a flagger.

      The primary measures of effectiveness were determined as Red Light Running (RLR) violation percentages, vehicle delay

      estimates, queue lengths, signal timing operations, and general field operations. Data were collected three days per week

      over a period of four weeks from August 5, 2014, to August 28, 2014, at four different temporary work zones in Kansas.

      Two PTS units were used for the purpose of the study in conjunction with pilot car operations.

      It was found that the percentage of violations for the flagger only, PTS with a flagger, and PTS without a flagger

      were 1.1, 1.3, and 3.1 percent, respectively. A test of proportions conducted on the three samples at a 0.05 level of

      significance indicated that there was a statistically significant difference in the number of violations when a PTS was used

      with a flagger and without a flagger, as compared to when flagging only operations were used. Similarly, there was a

      statistically significant difference in the number of violations when a PTS was used with a flagger and when a PTS was used

      without a flagger. It was also found that there was no statistically significant difference between the number of RLR vehicles

      that followed an already departed queue for the PTS with a flagger and PTS without a flagger conditions. It was found that

      there was a statistically significant difference in the number of RLR vehicles that left the stopped queue and the number of

      vehicles that disregarded the PTS control for both the conditions.

      An exploratory delay analysis indicated that the presence of a flagger reduced the total delay by approximately 5

      percent of the delay that could have occurred during the normal operations when flaggers waved the vehicles through the red

      light. Finally, equations were developed to determine the volume thresholds at which the PTS system would fail and the

      appropriate green intervals needed to serve a certain queue length. It was found that based on the existing KDOT policy of a

      maximum pilot car roundtrip time of 15 minutes, the PTS system would fail at an annual average daily traffic (AADT) of

      approximately 7,083 vehicles per day and at a corresponding maximum green time of approximately 446 seconds.

      In conclusion, it was recommended to use a PTS unit without a flagger in conjunction with pilot car operations at

      long, rural two-lane work zones but other measures were suggested, such as engineering studies to more accurately estimate

      queue lengths, installation of static signs indicating the expected wait time, and regular inspections of the PTS units by site

      supervisors or crew members to mitigate excessive delays and monitor for RLR vehicles.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26