Embankment quality and assessment of moisture control implementation.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates
...

to

...
Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
...
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Embankment quality and assessment of moisture control implementation.



Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    A specification for contractor moisture quality control (QC) in roadway embankment construction has been in use for approximately 10

    years in Iowa on about 190 projects. The use of this QC specification and the development of the soils certification program for the Iowa

    Department of Transportation (DOT) originated from Iowa Highway Research Board (IHRB) embankment quality research projects.

    Since this research, the Iowa DOT has applied compaction with moisture control on most embankment work under pavements.

    This study set out to independently evaluate the actual quality of compaction using the current specifications. Results show that Proctor

    tests conducted by Iowa State University (ISU) using representative material obtained from each test section where field testing was

    conducted had optimum moisture contents and maximum dry densities that are different from what was selected by the Iowa DOT for

    QC/quality assurance (QA) testing. Comparisons between the measured and selected values showed a standard error of 2.9 lb/ft3 for

    maximum dry density and 2.1% for optimum moisture content. The difference in optimum moisture content was as high as 4% and the

    difference in maximum dry density was as high as 6.5 lb/ft3. The difference at most test locations, however, were within the allowable

    variation suggested in AASHTO T 99 for test results between different laboratories. The ISU testing results showed higher rates of data

    outside of the target limits specified based on the available contractor QC data for cohesive materials. Also, during construction

    observations, wet fill materials were often observed. Several test points indicated that materials were placed and accepted at wet of the

    target moisture contents. The statistical analysis results indicate that the results obtained from this study showed improvements over

    results from previous embankment quality research projects (TR-401 Phases I through III and TR-492) in terms of the percentage of

    data that fell within the specification limits. Although there was evidence of improvement, QC/QA results are not consistently meeting

    the target limits/values.

    Recommendations are provided in this report for Iowa DOT consideration with three proposed options for improvements to the current

    specifications. Option 1 provides enhancements to current specifications in terms of material-dependent control limits, training,

    sampling, and process control. Option 2 addresses development of alternative specifications that incorporate dynamic cone penetrometer

    or light weight deflectometer testing into QC/QA. Option 3 addresses incorporating calibrated intelligent compaction measurements into

    QC/QA.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF-10.04 MB]

Related Documents

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov