Conceptual development of an impact-attenuation system for intersecting roadways.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Conceptual development of an impact-attenuation system for intersecting roadways.

Filetype[PDF-41.57 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Corporate Publisher:
    • Abstract:
      Longitudinal barriers are commonly used to shield hazards, including stiff bridge rail ends and slopes. In some locations,

      a secondary roadway intersects the primary roadway within the guardrail’s length-of-need (LON). Some intersections may

      have as little as 15 ft (4.6 m) between the intersection and beginning of the bridge railing, which require short-radius

      guardrail systems. One short-radius guardrail system has passed several crash tests under AASHTO Manual for Assessing

      Safety Hardware (MASH) standards.

      Site conditions provided by the Nebraska Department of Roads were used to determine the constraints for a new safety

      treatment for intersecting roadways and include intersection radii, bridge railing offset distances, and clear zone distances.

      An examination of the site conditions determined that the bridge railing end should be treated as a hazard, as defined in the

      AASHTO Roadside Design Guide. The hazard would begin at the bridge railing end with a width extending to the clear

      zone. Several design concepts were developed to treat these situations with a preference on using existing technologies that

      could be adapted for this hazard scenario.

      Fifteen concepts were brainstormed, with three considered for further analysis and evaluation. These concepts included

      net attenuation/end terminal, inertial barrel array/end terminal, and a bullnose with a secondary energy absorber inside of it.

      All three systems were capable of stopping a vehicle in the space available, but only the net attenuation/end terminal

      concept was considered likely to accommodate the site conditions using a moderate slope behind the system. Four dynamic

      bogie tests and two static tests were performed on potential net attenuators to evaluate their use as energy absorbers in the

      preferred design concept. Recommendations for further development of the net attenuation system were provided.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26