Pullout resistance of mechanically stabilized earth wall steel strip reinforcement in uniform aggregate.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Pullout resistance of mechanically stabilized earth wall steel strip reinforcement in uniform aggregate.

Filetype[PDF-1.78 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    A wide range of reinforcement-backfill combinations have been used in mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. Steel

    strips are one type of reinforcement used to stabilize aggregate backfill through anchorage. In the current MSE wall design, pullout

    capacity of steel strips is evaluated to ensure internal stability of the reinforced mass. The pullout resistance of reinforcement is

    expressed in terms of pullout resistance factor that measures the reinforcement-backfill interaction. This pullout resistance factor is

    commonly determined by performing pullout tests.

    AASHTO (2012) LRFD Bridge Design Specifications provides default values of pullout resistance factor, F*, for strip

    reinforcement embedded in backfill material with a uniformity coefficient of Cu ≥ 4, where the uniformity coefficient is defined as

    the ratio of the particle size at 60% finer to that at 10% finer. However, for backfill with a uniformity coefficient of Cu < 4,

    AASHTO recommends project-specific pullout tests. This AASHTO requirement has disqualified a large amount of aggregates

    produced in Kansas quarries, or made them difficult and/or costly to be used in MSE wall construction. To address this problem,

    an experimental study was undertaken in the Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory at The University of Kansas to examine the

    effect of aggregate uniformity on pullout resistance of steel strips when the uniformity coefficient of aggregate is Cu < 4.

    Eighteen pullout tests were carried out on ribbed steel strip reinforcements embedded in six aggregate backfills with

    uniformity coefficients ranging from 1.4 to 14. The pullout resistance of each reinforcement-backfill combination was investigated

    under three normal stresses to simulate reinforcements placed at different depths of fill. Each test sample was prepared in a

    consistent way to minimize variations. One of the important influence factors was degree of compaction.

    The test results demonstrated that the overall trend for all types of aggregates was similar. The uniform aggregates

    generally behaved the same way as the well-graded aggregates in terms of pullout resistance. The effect of aggregate uniformity

    was more obvious in the tests under a lower normal stress than under a higher normal stress. When the normal stress was at 10 psi,

    there was no obvious effect of aggregate uniformity.

    Furthermore, the pullout resistance factors obtained from this study were compared with the default F* values for ribbed

    strip reinforcement provided by AASHTO (2012). The comparison shows that the pullout resistance factor for ribbed steel strips

    decreased with depth in the same way as suggested by AASHTO. However, the F* values recommended by AASHTO are

    conservative as compared with the test results when aggregate backfills with uniformity coefficients ranging from 1.4 to 14 were

    used. In other words, the F* values recommended by AASHTO can be used to design MSE walls with ribbed steel strips in

    aggregate backfills with a uniformity coefficient as low as 1.4.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov