Laboratory investigation of concrete beam-end treatments.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Laboratory investigation of concrete beam-end treatments.

Filetype[PDF-7.92 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The ends of prestressed concrete beams under expansion joints are often exposed to moisture and chlorides. Left unprotected, the

      moisture and chlorides come in contact with the ends of the prestressing strands and/or the mild reinforcing, resulting in

      corrosion. Once deterioration begins, it progresses unless some process is employed to address it. Deterioration can lead to loss of

      bearing area and therefore a reduction in bridge capacity.

      Previous research has looked into the use of concrete coatings (silanes, epoxies, fiber-reinforced polymers, etc.) for protecting

      prestressed concrete beam ends but found that little to no laboratory research has been done related to the performance of these

      coatings in this specific type of application.

      The Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) currently specifies coating the ends of exposed prestressed concrete beams with

      Sikagard 62 (a high-build, protective, solvent-free, epoxy coating) at the precast plant prior to installation on the bridge.

      However, no physical testing of Sikagard 62 in this application has been completed. In addition, the Iowa DOT continues to see

      deterioration in the prestressed concrete beam ends, even those treated with Sikagard 62.

      The goals of this project were to evaluate the performance of the Iowa DOT-specified beam-end coating as well as other concrete

      coating alternatives based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) T259-80

      chloride ion penetration test and to test their performance on in-service bridges throughout the duration of the project. In addition,

      alternative beam-end forming details were developed and evaluated for their potential to mitigate and/or eliminate the

      deterioration caused by corrosion of the prestressing strands on prestressed concrete beam ends used in bridges with expansion

      joints. The alternative beam-end details consisted of individual strand blockouts, an individual blockout for a cluster of strands,

      dual blockouts for two clusters of strands, and drilling out the strands after they are flush cut. The goal of all of the forming

      alternatives was to offset the ends of the prestressing strands from the end face of the beam and then cover them with a

      grout/concrete layer, thereby limiting or eliminating their exposure to moisture and chlorides.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26