Evaluating outcomes of raising speed limits on high speed non-freeways.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Evaluating outcomes of raising speed limits on high speed non-freeways.

Filetype[PDF-1.30 MB]

  • English

  • Details:

    • Corporate Creators:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The purpose of this research was to assist in determining the potential impacts of implementing a

      proposed 65 mph speed limit on non-freeways in Michigan. Consideration was given to a broad range of

      performance measures, including operating speeds, traffic crashes and crash severity, infrastructure costs,

      fuel consumption, and travel times. Specifically, a prioritization strategy was developed to identify

      candidate MDOT non-freeway road segments possessing lower safety risks and potential infrastructure

      costs associated with raising the speed limit from 55 to 65 mph. Ultimately, approximately 747 miles of

      undivided and 26 miles of divided 55 mph non-freeways were identified as lower risk candidates,

      representing approximately one-eighth of the MDOT systemwide mileage posted at 55 mph. An

      economic analysis of the anticipated costs and benefits associated with the proposed speed limit increase

      was performed for these lower risk candidate segments, in addition to a systemwide estimate. As the

      travel time savings were expected to outweigh the fuel consumption costs, it was necessary to determine

      if these net operational benefits outweighed the expected infrastructure upgrade costs and increased crash

      costs. For roadways possessing horizontal and/or vertical alignments that are not compliant with a 65

      mph speed limit, an unfavorable benefit/cost ratio would likely result due to the excessive infrastructure

      costs incurred during 3R (resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation) or 4R (reconstruction) projects. Crashes

      were expected to increase for all implementation scenarios, with a particular increase in the risk of fatal

      and incapacitating injuries. Due to the substantially large infrastructure costs, application of the 65 mph

      speed limit is specifically not recommended for non-freeway segments requiring horizontal or vertical

      realignment to achieve design speed compliance. Even for segments where compliance with the

      increased design speed is maintained, careful consideration must be given to the potential safety impacts –

      particularly to fatal and injury crashes – that may result after increasing the speed limit.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.25