United States Department of Transportation
i
Safety evaluation of signal installation with and without left turn lanes on two lane roads in rural and suburban areas.
-
2014-10-01
[PDF-1.71 MB]
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:Data from 117 intersections on two lane roads in rural and suburban areas in North Carolina were used to determine the safety
effect of signalization with and without left turn lanes. This was a before-after study that was conducted using the empirical
Bayes method. Before signalization, all the 117 intersections were controlled by stop signs on the minor legs. As part of
implementing the empirical Bayes method, safety performance functions were estimated using data from a reference group of
minor road stop controlled intersections. Results have been provided for three and four leg intersections separately. Five
types of crashes were investigated: total, injury and fatal, rear end, frontal impact (type 1), and frontal impact (type 2).
It is clear that the introduction of signals without the addition of left turn lanes resulted in a reduction in total crashes, injury
and fatal crashes, and frontal impact crashes (both types), and an increase in rear end crashes. When left turn lanes were
added, rear end crashes decreased as well. Injury and fatal crashes and rear end crashes benefited the most from the addition
of left turn lanes. Overall, frontal impact crashes did not benefit from the addition of the left turn lanes. These results along
with information about the cost of adding left and right turn lanes could be used by NCDOT to determine the locations where
these turn lanes would be most cost-effective.
-
Format:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
