Effect of changing driving conditions on driver behavior towards design of a safe and efficient traffic system.
-
2013-12-01
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:This simulation-based study explores the effects of different work zone configurations, varying distances
between traffic signs, traffic density and individual differences on drivers’ behavior. Conventional Lane
Merge (CLM) and Joint Lane Merge (JLM) were modeled in a driving simulator and thirty participants
(seven female and 23 male students) navigated through the two configurations with two levels of traffic
density and in three different conditions: a) standard sign distance, b) 25% reduction, and c) 25% increase
in the distance between traffic signs in the advance warning zone. Information regarding travel time, speed,
braking force and location of merge was collected through the simulator. Self-reported measures of mental
demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, frustration and total workload were
recorded from all participants by using the NASA TLX. The results show that, on average, driving through
the JLM took 18.8% longer than the CLM. Moreover, no significant difference in speed was found
between the two merge configurations. However, the percent maximum braking force was34% lower in the
JLM configuration. The comparison of two merge configurations with respect to the location of changing
lanes suggest that overall, the JLM configuration encourages drivers to remain in the closed lane longer.
The analysis of self-reported workload ratings shows that participants reported 15.3% lower total workload
and 18.8% higher performance when driving through the JLM. Moreover, mental demand, temporal
demand, effort and frustration were lower in JLM by 16.4%, 23.4%, 13.7% and 28%, respectively. In terms
of self-reported workload, the JLM is more conducive to driving. In conclusion, the JLM outperforms the
CLM.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type: