Investigation of Anchor Nut Loosening in High-Mast Light Poles Using Field Monitoring and Finite Element Analysis
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Investigation of Anchor Nut Loosening in High-Mast Light Poles Using Field Monitoring and Finite Element Analysis

Filetype[PDF-3.90 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      High mast lighting poles (HMLPs) are cost effective structures for lighting highways and intersections. They are 100 to 250 feet (30m to 76m) tall, and can hold a variety of lamp configurations. They are commonly used at highway interchanges because a single unit effectively covers more area than the typical, approximately 30 foot (10m) tall, light poles. The AKDOT&PF maintains 104 such poles in the greater Anchorage area. One issue that has been observed by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (AKDOT&PF) with HMLPs is anchor nut loosening. Anchor rods and their associated nuts are used to secure the HMLP base plate to the pole’s foundation. When they’re tight, they allow the rods to transfer load from the HMLP to the foundation. The anchor nuts have been loosening on many HMLPs regardless of foundation type, pole height, lamp configuration, date of installation, number of anchor rods, rod diameter, or temperature during the time of installation. Any poles that have loose nuts undergo a re- tightening procedure outlined by the American Association of Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO). From 2007-2011, 177 inspections were done on 104 poles. 54 of these inspections revealed loose anchor nuts. This program is too costly for the Department to continue indefinitely. The need for solutions for existing and yet to be installed poles is evident. To understand the behavior of HMLP foundations during tightening, strains were monitored in the anchor rods of two HMLPs. The first was tightened according to existing AASTHO provisions. The second modified those provisions based on the conclusions drawn from the first tightening. The strains in the rods of both HMLPs were monitored after their tightening procedures to try to capture anchor nuts loosening. The tightening procedures did not result in rod pretension magnitudes below existing recommendations. Some of the rods in the initial tightening procedure resulted in rods tightened above yield. Existing literature suggests that the recommended pretension magnitudes are adequate to prevent nearly all loosening in dynamic loading scenarios of low magnitude. This is how traditional loosening manifests itself, with the nut rotating due to vibratory effects. There are reports by AKDOT&PF personnel who indicated that nuts that were “loose” didn’t rotate from a position which was marked after tightening. The loss of clamp load without rotation of either clamping nut has been quantified in previous studies which showed that to simulate this nonlinear post-yield behavior, a complex model is required. This model must allow for contact interactions, friction between parts, nonlinear behavior, displacement based tightening, and force based loading. Finite-element (FE) modelling satisfies all these requirements in the most accurate way possible. An FE model was created of several HMLP foundation configurations, including the two whose tightening was monitored in the field. In addition to these scenarios, the effects of thickening the base plates, adding stiffeners to the poles, and using high strength anchor rods were analyzed. Significant clamp load loss due to post-yield effects was recreated in all of the scenarios. One such scenario had complete clamp load loss in five rods with a single application of a design wind load. Other scenarios were highly resistant to this type of clamp load loss. A number of conclusions were drawn from these studies. It is shown that large diameter fasteners with short grip lengths are snug tightened without controlling the torque, they are likely to exceed the recommended snug tight pretension range. Final bolt pretensions would be more likely to fall within the desired range if the degree of rotation in the turn- of-the-nut method were adjusted for the grip length/rod diameter ratio. Clamp load loss due to permanent rod deformation is not affected by pretension magnitude (in F1554 grade 55 rods). The difference between the magnitude of external load required to cause complete clamp load loss in one rod, and that required to cause complete clamp load loss in several rods, is relatively small. Rods in double nut moment connections and high strength rods are less likely to experience clamp load loss due to permanent deformation. Recommendations for existing and yet to be installed HMLPs are presented based on these conclusions
    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26