Welcome to ROSA P | Measurement of adhesion properties between topcoat paint and metallized/galvanized steel with surface energy measurement equipment. - 27857 | US Transportation Collection
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Measurement of adhesion properties between topcoat paint and metallized/galvanized steel with surface energy measurement equipment.
  • Published Date:
    2013-09-01
  • Language:
    English
Filetype[PDF-135.63 MB]


This document cannot be previewed automatically as it exceeds 5 MB
Please click the download button to view the document.
Measurement of adhesion properties between topcoat paint and metallized/galvanized steel with surface energy measurement equipment.
Details:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    NETCR93
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Format:
  • Abstract:
    The objectives of this research project are: (1) Compare the adhesion properties of NEPCOAT-approved topcoat paint over

    metallized or galvanized steel. Use “surface-energy” measuring technique to characterize the wetting properties of the liquid paint

    on the profiled zinc surfaces. Explore correlation between the adhesive strength and the liquid paint wetting properties. As control

    the adhesion properties of topcoat paint over zinc primer painted steel substrates will also be measured. (2) Investigate various

    factors affecting the adhesion of topcoat paint over galvanizing. (3) Report and recommend practices that produce the best adhesion

    of NEPCOAT-approved topcoat paints over metallized and particularly galvanized steel surfaces. We prepared four different types

    of test panels coated with five different commercial paint systems. The paint systems include four systems adapted from the

    NEPCOAT list of intermediate and top paints qualified for bare steel, and one system of epoxy sealer for metallized surface. Four

    types of substrates were used for fabricating the test panels: (1) galvanized steel with mechanical grinding to produce rough

    surface, (2) galvanized steel with blast profiling to produce rough surface, (3) galvanized steel stored indoors for two weeks before

    blast profiling and painting, and (4) metallized steel with inherent roughness due to the thermal spray process. We recorded, as a

    function of time, the contact angle of droplets of freshly prepared liquid paints on the replicas of the substrate used for spray

    painting. The cured test panels were subject to pull-off strength tests according to the ASTM D4541 standard, and the X-cut tape

    tests according to Method A of ASTM D3359 standard. Images of the pull-off test break surfaces were photographed and

    examined. We analyzed the correlation between the pull-off strengths and the contact angles. The correlation provided insight on

    the relative adhesive strengths of the different paint-substrate pairs. We concluded that (1) the NEPCOAT paints could be used for

    galvanized and metallized steel to obtain comparable adhesion performance as that of the zinc-rich organic primer coated steel, (2)

    although the NEPCOAT intermediate paint on the metallized surface has adequate pull-off strength to pass the inspection, it is

    highly recommended that the state DOT specification of the use of sealant is strictly followed, (3) although the exposure to

    atmosphere after galvanizing is commonly recognized as a problem for paint adhesion, we found that a time delay of two weeks

    between galvanizing and profiling/painting is permissible if the galvanized steel is stored in the normal indoor dry atmosphere, (4)

    we think a refined quantitative correlation between pull-off strength and contact angle could be useful for optimizing the paint-tosubstrate

    match.

  • Supporting Files:
    No Additional Files
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like:
Submit Feedback >