Subsurface condition evaluation for asphalt pavement preservation treatments.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Subsurface condition evaluation for asphalt pavement preservation treatments.

Filetype[PDF-12.08 MB]

Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      This report presents a case study on the SR‐70 section with microsurface for understanding its performance; a development of a

      methodology for evaluating the asphalt pavement subsurface condition for applying pavement preservation treatments; and a

      development of a tool for identifying and quantifying the subsurface distresses.

      From the case study, it was found that the main distresses on SR‐70 were longitudinal cracks, fatigue cracks, and potholes. The

      longitudinal cracking was the most widely distributed distress with 22% of lane length in the 2‐mile test section among the three distress

      types. Based on the water stripping test results and the core visual observations, it was confirmed that the test section on SR‐70 had the

      water stripping problem.

      In order to have a representative condition indicator for the test section, the conditions were converted into the scores scaled from 0 to

      100. Layers with closer to a score of 100 have the better subsurface condition. Therefore, the 28% of the test section length with the

      surface distress was detected as the fair subsurface condition with a score of 56. The rest 72% of the length was estimated as the good

      subsurface condition with a score of 78. Similarly, 20.5% of the test section length with the problem locations determined by GPR had the

      fair subsurface condition with a score of 56 and the rest 79.5 % of the length had the good subsurface condition with a score of 76.

      The lab test results showed poor correlations among the water stripping severities, air voids, and tensile strengths. Thus, the air voids or

      tensile strength cannot properly estimate the water stripping severity or vice versa. When the laboratory test results with the surface

      distresses or in the GPR‐based problem locations were compared to that without the surface distresses or in the GPR‐based non‐problem

      locations, in general, average air voids and water stripping severities decrease and average tensile strengths increase. The observation

      confirms that the evaluation processes are applicable for evaluating the subsurface condition. Furthermore, the probability that a

      location determined to be problematic by GPR to be on one of poor conditions based on lab tests was 1.0. The same probability was

      obtained for a GPS‐based problem location. Accordingly, it was concluded that the laboratory tests with the surface distresses survey or

      the GPR measurement were reliable method to evaluate the subsurface condition. The FWD results had a weak correlation with the

      laboratory test results possibly due to fairly long testing interval (i.e., 328 ft). The current FWD test protocol should be improved for

      evaluating the subsurface condition in pavement preservation application.

      Guidelines of subsurface condition evaluation for pavement preservation treatment application was developed utilizing the findings from

      the case study. A concept of hierarchy was used in the guideline by taking project importance and available resources into consideration.

      A tool including guidelines, computer software (e.g., iSub and iMoisture), and its manual was also developed based on the methodology

      as a research product. Based on the guideline, it was concluded that the subsurface condition of the case study section on SR‐70 was

      inadequate for the application of the pavement preservation treatments.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at

    Version 3.26