Development of laboratory test methods to replace the simulated high-temperature grout fluidity test.
-
2014-06-01
Details
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:This report contains a summary of the research performed to develop a replacement for the high-temperature grout ; fluidity (HTGF) test. The HTGF test was employed in the past by FDOT to qualify post-tensioning (PT) grouts for use in ; post-tensioned bridge construction. The HTGF test, however, is expensive and cumbersome to conduct in a typical ; construction materials testing laboratory. ; The objective of this research project was to develop a replacement for the HTGF test using a dynamic shear rheometer ; (DSR). Initially, exploratory studies were conducted using a number of DSR test methods and geometries to develop or ; adopt a method that provides more consistent and rational rheological results than the currently used flow cone test method. ; These studies led to the adoption of the viscosity test with a cup and ribbon geometry. The shear rate used in the viscosity ; test (50 s-1) was based on data from the literature and from the estimated shear rate at the nozzle of a flow cone. ; In addition to the DSR test development, HTGF tests were conducted twice on four different commercially available PT ; grouts. PT grout temperatures increased an average of 7°F (4°C) over the course of the circulation during HTGF testing. ; Line pressures measured at the pump during circulation ranged from 100 to 350 psi (4 kPa to 17 kPa). ; Viscosity results measured during the HTGF test were correlated to performance of the PT grouts. The viscosity results ; compared well with flow cone results with an R2 value of 0.85. From these data, performance classifications were ; developed based on the results of the testing. ; Finally, DSR testing was conducted at University of Minnesota-Duluth (UMD) and National Institute of Standards and ; Technology (NIST) to provide a comparison of the viscosity results from these laboratories to those produced by the ; University of Florida. Trends in viscosity test results compared well with results from both UMD and NIST. Absolute ; magnitudes, however, varied somewhat. This is thought to be due to the sensitive nature of the mixing and conditioning ; process. Additional performance classifications were developed based on the findings of these studies.
-
Format:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:2acea86b2cb69d608eb43e5674094b986def65137cf9c84750279bc49abad525