Field demonstration of new bridge approach slab designs and performance.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Field demonstration of new bridge approach slab designs and performance.

Filetype[PDF-1.58 MB]

  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) has initiated a major effort to minimize the bridge end bump problem associated

      with differential settlement. As a result, a new design for the approach slab was proposed, which requires increasing the slab flexural rigidity (EI), and

      using reinforced soil foundation (RSF) to support the slab and traffic loads at the roadway pavement/approach slab joint (R/S joint). Reinforcing the soil

      underneath the strip footing will result in increasing the soil’s bearing capacity and reducing the embankment settlement by redistributing the loads

      imposed by the slab and traffic over a wider area. Bayou Courtableau Bridge was selected as a demonstration project to evaluate, validate, and verify the

      new bridge approach slab design method proposed in a previous study. The east and west approach slabs at Bayou Courtableau Bridge are 40 ft. long by 40

      ft. wide. The west approach slab was designed using the proposed new method with slab thickness of 16 in., while the east approach slab was designed

      using the traditional method with slab thickness of 12 in. The pavement end side of the approach slab was supported by a 4.0-ft. wide strip footing with the

      soil underneath it reinforced by six layers of geogrid placed at a vertical spacing of 12 in. The geosynthetic reinforced soil below the strip footing was

      designed according to the methodology proposed in previous study. The west approach slab was instrumented with pressure cells to measure the pressure

      distribution underneath the footing and contact pressure underneath the slabs. Strain gauges were used to measure strain distribution along geogrid

      reinforcement and sister-bar strain gauges to measure strains within the slab. The east approach slab was instrumented with pressure cells to measure the

      contact pressure underneath slab. Two static load tests were conducted on both the west and east approach slabs at two different times after construction.

      The performance of the approach slabs, including deformation and internal stresses of concrete slab, contact stresses between slab and embankment, stress

      distributions within reinforced soil foundation, and strain distributions along the geogrid, was monitored during the tests. The test results indicated that the

      west approach slab (with new design) lost most of its supports from the soil; while the east approach slab (with traditional design) kept losing its contacts

      from the soil starting from the bridge side towards the pavement side after about a year and half. The roughness profiles show better performance of the

      new approach slab system with much lower International Roughness Index (IRI) values. The year and a half monitoring program at Bayou Courtableau

      Bridge demonstrated much better performance of the new approach slab design system (west approach slab) compared to the traditional design.

      The magnitude and rate of embankment settlement at Bayou Courtableau Bridge site was also monitored (for the two embankment sides) during and after

      the construction, and the results were compared with the laboratory calculated settlements and the piezocone penetration test (PCPT)-based settlement

      prediction methods. The results showed better predictions using PCPT methods as compared to laboratory results.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at

    Version 3.26