The politics of large infrastructure investment decision-making : the case of the second avenue subway case study.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Document Data
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


The politics of large infrastructure investment decision-making : the case of the second avenue subway case study.

Filetype[PDF-832.46 KB]



  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Over the past few decades, urbanization and economic growth have intensified the need for more efficient urban and

    regional transportation, including the expansion and reorganization of existing transportation networks. Given such

    huge investments and severe constraints on resources such as financial and land, infrastructure projects require a

    careful prioritization and selection among available alternatives. In reality, project selection appears to be determined as

    much by politics as by transport-economic considerations. This paper traces the politics of megaproject decision-making of the Second Avenue Subway (SAS), a subway project in New York. The project’s first stage is currently being

    built after nearly 100 years of effort. In particular, we examine whether project-related decisions were the results of

    power struggles between the involved actors, and less the results of transportation planning concerns. We argue that

    the re-organization of transportation institutions, specifically the formation of the Metropolitan Transportation Agency

    (MTA), enabled the selection and implementation of SAS. While transportation agencies are bound by the legal and

    bureaucratic rules set by those who create them, they have their own agendas and are crucial for project selection. If

    successful, as in the case of the Second Avenue Subway, they can establish political momentum against political and

    fiscal adversity. Against the background of this project long planning and failure history, we find that besides the

    creation of the MTA, the following factors contributed to project eventual success: 1) the long project history bestowed a

    “legendary” character upon the project; 2) a “window of opportunity” opened up for inner-city projects after September

    11; 3) a strong set of project champions advanced the project; and 4) the nature of funding arrangements was

    instrumental in this project success.

  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at