The politics of large infrastructure investment decision-making : the case of the second avenue subway case study.
-
2013-11-01
Details
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:Over the past few decades, urbanization and economic growth have intensified the need for more efficient urban and ; regional transportation, including the expansion and reorganization of existing transportation networks. Given such ; huge investments and severe constraints on resources such as financial and land, infrastructure projects require a ; careful prioritization and selection among available alternatives. In reality, project selection appears to be determined as ; much by politics as by transport-economic considerations. This paper traces the politics of megaproject decision-making of the Second Avenue Subway (SAS), a subway project in New York. The project’s first stage is currently being ; built after nearly 100 years of effort. In particular, we examine whether project-related decisions were the results of ; power struggles between the involved actors, and less the results of transportation planning concerns. We argue that ; the re-organization of transportation institutions, specifically the formation of the Metropolitan Transportation Agency ; (MTA), enabled the selection and implementation of SAS. While transportation agencies are bound by the legal and ; bureaucratic rules set by those who create them, they have their own agendas and are crucial for project selection. If ; successful, as in the case of the Second Avenue Subway, they can establish political momentum against political and ; fiscal adversity. Against the background of this project long planning and failure history, we find that besides the ; creation of the MTA, the following factors contributed to project eventual success: 1) the long project history bestowed a ; “legendary” character upon the project; 2) a “window of opportunity” opened up for inner-city projects after September ; 11; 3) a strong set of project champions advanced the project; and 4) the nature of funding arrangements was ; instrumental in this project success.
-
Format:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:d742b3710e5e634794d33a0db51705ad5c168e79d2bf922e3f62474721a65bca