Evaluation of winter pothole patching methods.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Evaluation of winter pothole patching methods.

Filetype[PDF-8.12 MB]

Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The main objective of this study was to evaluate the performance and cost-effectiveness of the tow-behind combination

      infrared asphalt heater/reclaimer patching method and compare it to the throw and roll and spray injection methods. To

      achieve this objective a national survey was first conducted to document the experience of the infrared asphalt

      heater/reclaimer users in different states. In addition, a comprehensive testing program, that included installing over 60

      patches using the three considered methods as well as monitoring the performance and survivability of those patches, was

      performed. The results of the survey and subsequent phone interviews indicated that the infrared asphalt heater/reclaimer

      equipment can significantly improve the performance and longevity of pothole patches and can be cost-effective when proper

      installation procedures are followed. The results of testing program indicated that the infrared method had much lower

      productivity than the other two methods. In addition, the throw and roll had better productivity than the spray injection method.

      The properties and storage procedure of the asphalt mixture used in the infrared method were found to affect the

      performance of the installed patches. Improper storage of the infrared heater/reclaimer equipment also was found to cause

      problems in igniting the infrared heater, which significantly increased the patching duration. In general, most of the

      deterioration in the patches installed using the different methods occurred in the first month of installation and continued after

      that but at much slower rate. The infrared patches had significantly better performance than those installed using the two

      other patching methods. The main distress in infrared patches was raveling, while it was dishing for the throw and roll and

      spray injection patches. The results of survivability analyses also indicated that the patches installed using infrared had much

      longer expected life than those installed using the other two considered methods. The results of the cost analyses showed

      that the infrared method can be more cost-effective than the spray injection method when used for winter pothole patching.

      For short term repairs, the throw and roll method was found to cost less than the infrared method if the user cost were not

      considered. However, for permanent repairs, the infrared method can be more cost effective than throw and roll method. In

      summary, the tow-behind infrared heater/reclaimer was found to be an efficient and cost effective method for patching certain

      types of potholes as well as performing other pavement repairs. A strategy for its deployment in Ohio is provided in this


    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26