A performance comparison of asphalt mixtures modified with hydrated lime, polymer modified binder and reclaimed asphalt shingles (RAS) on Route 50 Moniteau, Morgan and Pettis counties.
Schroer, J. (2013). A performance comparison of asphalt mixtures modified with hydrated lime, polymer modified binder and reclaimed asphalt shingles (RAS) on Route 50 Moniteau, Morgan and Pettis counties (Report No. cmr 13-011). Missouri. Dept. of Transportation. Division of Construction and Materials. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26691
Schroer, Joe. A performance comparison of asphalt mixtures modified with hydrated lime, polymer modified binder and reclaimed asphalt shingles (RAS) on Route 50 Moniteau, Morgan and Pettis counties. Report no. cmr 13-011. Missouri. Dept. of Transportation. Division of Construction and Materials, 2013. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26691.
Schroer, Joe A performance comparison of asphalt mixtures modified with hydrated lime, polymer modified binder and reclaimed asphalt shingles (RAS) on Route 50 Moniteau, Morgan and Pettis counties. Missouri. Dept. of Transportation. Division of Construction and Materials, 2013, Report no. cmr 13-011, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26691.
Hydrated lime was required in high traffic asphalt mixtures controlled by Section 403 of the Missouri Standard Specifications for Highway Construction from the late 1980’s through much of the 1990’s primarily as an anti-stripping agent but also for some initial stiffness and stability in mixtures during placement. With the advent of the Superpave mix design system and volumetric field control of HMA, contractors began to complain that the hydrated lime requirement added dust to their mixtures that made it more challenging to meet volumetric requirements in the field without adding harder, more durable, (in other words, more expensive) aggregate. Sources for these aggregates are not as wide spread and many times cost more and require hauling more than 100 miles. For roughly the same cost in the mixture, they could use liquid anti-stripping agents but save money by using more aggregate local to the project. It was agreed to allow contractors to choose liquid anti-stripping agents or hydrated lime. Rather quickly, hydrated lime use became limited amongst contractors.
Schroer, J. (2013). A performance comparison of asphalt mixtures modified with hydrated lime, polymer modified binder and reclaimed asphalt shingles (RAS) on Route 50 Moniteau, Morgan and Pettis counties (Report No. cmr 13-011). Missouri. Dept. of Transportation. Division of Construction and Materials. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26691
Schroer, Joe. A performance comparison of asphalt mixtures modified with hydrated lime, polymer modified binder and reclaimed asphalt shingles (RAS) on Route 50 Moniteau, Morgan and Pettis counties. Report no. cmr 13-011. Missouri. Dept. of Transportation. Division of Construction and Materials, 2013. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26691.
Schroer, Joe A performance comparison of asphalt mixtures modified with hydrated lime, polymer modified binder and reclaimed asphalt shingles (RAS) on Route 50 Moniteau, Morgan and Pettis counties. Missouri. Dept. of Transportation. Division of Construction and Materials, 2013, Report no. cmr 13-011, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26691.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.