Quantifying the impact of new freeway segments.
-
2013-05-01
Details
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:Many freeway users complain that new freeway segments immediately fill up with traffic after they are constructed. This ; diminishes the advantages of reduced costs and reduced driving time that would make freeways theoretically superior to ; arterial streets. According to previous literature, however, this phenomenon is to be expected and is not an indicator of the ; efficiency or inefficiency of having new freeways. Due to Downs’s Law of Peak-hour Traffic Congestion, we expect freeways ; to immediately fill upon construction, simply because they do offer superior benefits to roadway users compared to the ; alternative arterial streets. Rational drivers choose to enjoy these benefits. Another phenomenon cited in the literature review ; is that of induced travel, which states that with the reduction in travel time posed by using freeway segments, it can also be ; expected that more commuters will choose to travel on them than otherwise would. ; When Downs’s Law works synergistically with the phenomenon of induced travel, more vehicles can be accommodated in a ; given geographical area, thus increasing the total number of trips taken. This adds to the overall value of our transportation ; system, since after all, the value of that system is predicated on its ability to facilitate increased volume of travel. ; This report is based on data acquired from the State of Arizona, the City of Phoenix and Maricopa County, Arizona, and other ; sources. Through our analysis of Maricopa County traffic count data we are able to show a significant increase in traffic ; volume resulting from adding new freeways. This increase in traffic volume accounts for a net benefit of over $18 million ; dollars per year for a given mile-long stretch of roadway. Over a freeway design-life of 20 years this is far in excess of the ; average of $72 million needed to construct that mile of freeway. ; Ultimately, any evaluation of the freeway system must take into consideration the explicit and implicit benefits of the system. ; We know that congestion is going to be present whether new freeways are constructed or not. Before freeway segments are ; constructed, the existing arterial streets are congested. After the completion of freeway segments, some drivers shift from ; arterial streets to the new freeway. This lessens traffic on the arterials, leading to more drivers taking trips they previously ; avoided (i.e. induced travel). Even though congestion is an inevitable condition, even on freeway segments postconstruction, freeways still offer a clear net benefit.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:9f34262afa9e145a3dbfbe236a8fef319aea92c64847d5dff55b9934e6ed173a