Laboratory fatigue evaluation of continuously fiber-reinforced concrete pavement.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Laboratory fatigue evaluation of continuously fiber-reinforced concrete pavement.

Filetype[PDF-139.08 KB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • NTL Classification:
    NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Pavement Management and Performance;NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Construction and Maintenance;
  • Abstract:
    Portland cement concrete (PCC) is the world’s most versatile construction material. PCC has

    been in use in the United States for over 100 years. PCC pavement is generally constructed as

    either continually reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) or jointed plain concrete pavement

    (JPCP). CRCP is constructed with steel reinforcing totaling about 0.7 percent that is intended

    for crack control and to provide load transfer once cracks have formed by keeping crack faces

    in close contact. JPCP is constructed from unreinforced concrete with steel dowel bars over the

    saw-cut joints to provide load transfer between slabs. CRCP has the advantage of not having

    joints, which leads to better ride quality and generally longer life, if constructed properly. JPCP

    is advantageous because it generally costs about 20 percent less than a comparable CRCP

    section. The major drawback to JPCP is the joints. The relatively large saw-cut joints produce

    more noise generation than CRCP, and create points for water movement into the pavement

    structure. Recently, it has been noticed on a wide scale within the United States that a great

    number of JPCPs in the 15-25 year age range are exhibiting spalling and severe deterioration

    at the joints. Various theories are being explored nationally to explain the causes of premature

    joint deterioration, but all fall into the categories of unwanted moisture at the joint locations or

    damage caused in the sawing process. Concrete is durable and premature joint deterioration is

    unacceptable, as the intended design life of many of these pavement structures is 30-40 years. A

    need exists to produce a jointless pavement with the high cost of CRCP.

  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov