Welcome to ROSA P | Freeway work zone lane capacity. - 26349 | US Transportation Collection >
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Freeway work zone lane capacity.
  • Published Date:
    2009
  • Language:
    English
Filetype[PDF-3.98 MB]


Details:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • NTL Classification:
    NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATIONNTL-OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS-Congestion ; NTL-OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS-Traffic Flow ;
  • Format:
  • Description:
    The focus of this report is a capacity analysis of two long-term urban freeway Work Zones. Work Zone #1

    tapered four mainline lanes to two, using two separate tapers; Work Zone #2 tapered two mainline lanes to one.

    Work Zone throughput was analyzed throughout the day over multiple days and traffic operations conditions

    were analyzed up to a distance of five miles upstream of the Work Zone entrance. Historical data from

    pavement-embedded detectors were used to analyze traffic conditions. The database consisted of five-minute

    volume, speed and occupancy data collected from 78 detectors for a total of 50 days.

    Congestion during each analyzed Work Zone existed for more than fourteen hours each day; Work Zone

    impacts adversely affected freeway operations over distances of 3.7 to 4.2 miles. Speed and occupancy

    conditions further upstream were, however, not affected, or even improved due to significant trip diversion.

    Work Zone capacity was defined based on the maximum traffic flows observed over a one-hour period;

    throughput values were also compiled over longer periods of time when traffic was within 90% of the maximum

    observed one-hour flows, as well as over the multi-hour mid-day period. The Highway Capacity Manual

    freeway capacity definition based on the maximum observed 15-min period was not used, since it would have

    no practical application in estimating Work Zone throughput when congested conditions prevail for the majority

    of the hours of the day.

    Certain noteworthy changes took place for the duration of the analyzed Work Zones: per-lane throughput

    dropped; morning peak periods started earlier, evening peak periods ended later and lasted longer; mid-day

    volumes dropped accompanied by the highest occupancies of the day. Trip diversion was evident in lower

    volumes entering the analyzed freeway corridor, higher volumes using off-ramps and lower volumes using onramps

    upstream of the Work Zones. The majority of diverted traffic comprised smaller vehicles (vehicles up to

    21 feet in length); combination truck volumes increased and their use of the median lane increased, contrary to

    smaller vehicles that shifted toward a heavier use of the shoulder lane.

  • Funding:
  • Supporting Files:
    No Additional Files
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like:
Submit Feedback >