Quality assessment of geogrids used for subgrade treatment.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Quality assessment of geogrids used for subgrade treatment.

Filetype[PDF-7.02 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION;NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Pavement Management and Performance;
    • Abstract:
      Geogrid reinforcements have been used by the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) to construct stable subgrade foundations

      and to provide a working platform for construction over weak and soft soils. Use of geogrid reinforcement in a pavement system

      ensures a long‐lasting pavement structure by reducing excessive deformation and cracking. The main objectives of this research were to

      evaluate the mechanical interaction between a subgrade soil and an aggregate base layer with and without a geogrid in place at the

      interface. A series of large‐scale direct shear tests were performed to investigate the effects of geogrid properties, such as geogrid

      aperture area, junction strength, and tensile strength, on the interface shear strength of soil‐geogrid‐aggregate systems. The test results

      showed that the aperture size and junction strength of the geogrids were relatively important factors affecting the overall interface

      shear strength the most. The average values for the peak interface shear strength coefficient for the three normal stresses (50 kPa, 100

      kPa and 200 kPa) considered in this study ranged from 0.96 to 1.48. In addition, the test results showed that the average peak interface

      shear strength coefficient increases with increases in the junction strength of the geogrid. The optimum aperture area of the geogrid

      was found to be equal to 825 mm2 (1.4 in2) for the subgrade soil and aggregate considered in this study. There was no significant

      correlation between the geogrid tensile strength at 2% strain and the average peak interface shear strength coefficient. The effect of the

      moisture content of the subgrade soil on the peak interface shear strength coefficient was also investigated. The peak interface shear

      strength coefficient for the subgrade soil sample prepared at the optimum moisture content and compacted to relative compaction

      values of 94–96% (Rsoil = 95–96% and Raggregate = 94–95%) and tested under a normal stress of 100 kPa was 20% less than that for the

      subgrade soil sample prepared at a moisture content 4% above the optimum moisture content. Based on the results of the tests

      performed in this study, an aperture area requirement of 825 mm2 (1.4 in2) and a junction strength requirement of 11.5 kN/m (788 lb/ft)

      were suggested as preliminary guidelines for subgrade reinforcement systems. These requirements are only limited to the use of Type IV

      geogrid (INDOT specification 207.04) for subgrade reinforcement with aggregate No. 53.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26