A methodology for highway asset valuation in Indiana.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

A methodology for highway asset valuation in Indiana.

Filetype[PDF-14.18 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • NTL Classification:
    NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Bridges and Structures;NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Pavement Management and Performance;NTL-PLANNING AND POLICY-PLANNING AND POLICY;
  • Abstract:
    The Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) requires transportation agencies to report the values of their tangible assets.

    Numerous valuation methods exist which use different underlying concepts and data items. These traditional methods have a number

    of shortcomings, such as their implicit assumption that assets are monolithic and their inability to simultaneously consider a satisfactory

    range of value‐related asset attributes. In a bid to address these limitations, this report proposes a number of valuation methods. The

    elemental decomposition and multi‐criteria (EDMC) method carries out asset valuation on the basis of cost, remaining service life, and

    the condition of the individual components of an asset. The proposed replacement‐downtime‐salvage (RDS) method considers only the

    life‐cycle costs, including user cost during work zones and recycling benefits or disposal costs. The third proposed method,

    decommission‐and‐reuse (D&R), is based on the real‐estate value of the land occupied by the asset. The total value of Indiana’s state

    highway assets was determined in this study using the traditional and proposed methods; using the EDMC, this was estimated as

    approximately $68 billion. The value of pavements and bridges were $47.1B and $7.83B, respectively; together, these “large assets”

    constituted approximately 81.34% of total asset value. The total value of smaller assets was approximately $0.6B, constituting

    approximately 0.83% of the total value of assets; the breakdown was as follows: guardrails, $0.318B; underdrains, $0.005B; culverts,

    $0.214B; and road signs, $0.019B. The total value of the right‐of‐way was estimated at $12.04B. Using the straight line depreciation

    (SLD) method (the most common method used by other agencies), INDOT’s pavement and bridge values were determined as $12.4B and

    $9.59B, respectively. It was observed that the EDMC yields values that are significantly different from those from the traditional method,

    which could be due to the former explicitly considering the asset as an assemblage of components and thus carries out valuation for

    each component rather than considering the structure as a monolithic entity. On the basis of the unit asset values derived for Indiana,

    the existing asset inventory of other states, and the state‐specific cost factors, the total estimated value of state‐owned highway bridge

    and pavement assets in the United States was estimated at $1.4T or $4.4T using the traditional SLD and the EDMC methods respectively.

    For all highways in the United States, the estimated values were found to be $6.54T and $20.8T for the SLD and the EDMC methods,

    respectively. The study also explored ways by which asset value could be incorporated in investment evaluation.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov