Analysis of movable bus stop boarding and alighting areas.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Analysis of movable bus stop boarding and alighting areas.

Filetype[PDF-4.67 MB]

  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • NTL Classification:
    • Abstract:
      This study explored the feasibility of using movable and reusable boarding and alighting (B&A) pads at bus stops.

      Potential design alternatives in terms of materials and structural support for these pads were evaluated. The review

      focused on the existing and alternative design materials, especially in applications other than for transit purposes,

      which could potentially replace the existing conventional cast-in-place concrete slab.

      An online national survey of bus transit agencies was conducted to determine how transit agencies are meeting the

      Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) bus stop accessibility requirements and to get feedback and related

      information on the potential use of movable B&A pads at bus stops. A total of 84 transit agencies from 31 states and

      Puerto Rico responded to the survey. From the responses, none of the transit agencies were found to be using

      movable B&A pads. The potential benefits for using movable B&A pads were identified to be lower installation and

      maintenance cost, ease of installation and use, quicker installation, flexibility, portability, and passenger

      accessibility. Some potential concerns included lower durability, strength, and stability; greater risk of theft; space

      limitations; safety; and aesthetics.

      Six materials (i.e., concrete/asphalt, metal, rubber, thermoplastic, composite, and wood), along with their

      commercially available products, were evaluated based on their structural performance, long-term durability,

      adaptability, life cycle cost, aesthetics, and safety and accessibility of transit riders with mobility devices. Out of the

      six materials, plastic lumber and metal were found to have the highest potential to replace the conventional design.

      The plastic lumber presents the most viable option but the metallic materials, even though more expensive, have

      more potential for quicker installation, which can benefit transit agencies with anticipated frequent route changes.

      Additionally, the designs of each material option were proposed and recommended for further investigation.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at

    Version 3.26