Determination of the maximum MGS mounting height : phase II detailed analysis with LS-DYNA.

Julin, R.D.; Reid, J.D.; Faller, R.K.; Mongiardini, M.; Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Back to Previous Page

- Add this to...
- Twitter
- Facebook
- Google Bookmarks
- LinkedIn

Determination of the maximum MGS mounting height : phase II detailed analysis with LS-DYNA.

Published Date:

2012-12-01

Language:

English

[PDF-21.28 MB]

This document cannot be previewed automatically as it exceeds 5 MB

Please click the thumbnail image to view the document.

Determination of the maximum MGS mounting height : phase II detailed analysis with LS-DYNA.

Details:

Creators:

Julin, R.D. ; Reid, J.D. ; Faller, R.K. ; Mongiardini, M. ;

Corporate Creators:

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Corporate Contributors:

United States. Federal Highway Administration

Subject/TRT Terms:

Highway safety ; Traffic safety ; Impact tests ; Crash injury research ; Acceptance tests ; ... More ▼

Publication/ Report Number:

TRP-03-274-12

Resource Type:

Tech Report

Geographical Coverage:

Nebraska

Edition:

Final report.

Corporate Publisher:

Midwest States Regional Pooled Fund Program ; Nebraska. Dept. of Roads ;

NTL Classification:

NTL-OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS-OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS ; NTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-Highway Safety ;

Abstract:

Determination of the maximum Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) mounting height was performed in two phases.

Phase I concentrated on crash testing: two full-scale crash tests were performed on the MGS with top-rail mounting heights

of 34 in. (864 mm) and 36 in. (914 mm), each impacted by 1100C vehicles. Both system heights satisfied the Manual for

Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) Test Level 3 (TL-3) evaluation criteria for test no. 3-10. Phase I was documented in

the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility (MwRSF) Report No. TRP-03-255-12.

Phase II, the subject of this report, concentrated on a detailed analysis of an increased-height MGS using computer

simulation (Barrier VII and LS-DYNA). It was shown that on level terrain the MGS would satisfy MASH TL-3 evaluation

criteria with rail heights up to 36 in. Also, errant passenger vehicles were successfully contained on approach slopes as

steep as 6:1 when the rail was mounted at 36 in. Also, the 820C vehicle redirection was improved on 8:1 approach slopes

with rail mounting heights as large as 36 in. (914 mm). Furthermore, the effects of various vehicle geometries and their

associated complications were investigated.

Additional full-scale vehicle crash tests are necessary to confirm the simulation results before these taller systems can

be deemed crashworthy according to MASH. Nonetheless, there appeared to be a considerable amount of upside tolerance

for the rail height on the MASH-approved MGS. Evidence of this was given in a prior high-flare-rate study and the current

study.

Format:

PDF

Funding:

TPF-5(193)

Collection(s):

US Transportation Collection

Main Document Checksum:

[+]

Supporting Files:

No Additional Files

No Related Documents.

You May Also Like:

Increased span length for the MGS long-span guardrail system.

Published Date:

2014-12-01

Abstract:

Long-span guardrail systems have been recognized as an effective means of shielding low-fill culverts whileminimizing construction efforts and limiting culvert damage and repair. The current MGS long-span design provided thecapability to span unsuppo...

File Type:

[PDF - 23.45 MB]
Development of MASH TL-3 transition between guardrail and portable concrete barriers.

Published Date:

2014-06-01

Abstract:

Often, road construction causes the need to create a work zone. In these scenarios, portable concrete barriers (PCBs)are typically installed to shield workers and equipment from errant vehicles as well as prevent motorists from striking otherroadside...

File Type:

[PDF - 9.30 MB]
MGS dynamic deflections and working widths at lower speeds.

Published Date:

2015-09-01

Abstract:

The Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) has been full-scale crash tested in many configurations, includinginstallations adjacent to slopes, with different types of wood posts, with and without blockouts, for culvert and bridgeapplications, and at high fla...

File Type:

[PDF - 4.15 MB]
Downstream Anchoring Requirements for the Midwest Guardrail System

Published Date:

2013-10-28

Abstract:

Most state Departments of Transportation use simple adaptations of crashworthy guardrail end terminals as downstream anchorage systems, which typically include breakaway posts and an anchor cable. The safety performance of these downstream anchorage ...

File Type:

[PDF - 75.12 MB]
Extending TL-2 short radius guardrail to larger radii.

Published Date:

2014-03-31

Abstract:

Longitudinal barriers are commonly used to shield hazards including bridge rail ends, bridge parapets, and slopes. In some locations, a secondary roadway intersects the primary roadway within the guardrail’s length-of-need (LON). Some intersections...

File Type:

[PDF - 22.36 MB]

U.S. Department of Transportation

Want to know more?