Evaluation of MDOT's Distress Thresholds for Maintained June 30, 2012 Pavement Projects
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Evaluation of MDOT's Distress Thresholds for Maintained June 30, 2012 Pavement Projects

Filetype[PDF-1.12 MB]

  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final project report.
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Pavement Management and Performance ; NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Construction and Maintenance ;
    • Abstract:
      As an alternative to traditional contracting, pavement warranty has been adopted in Mississippi since 2000, aimed to

      enhance pavement performance and protect the investment in pavement construction. Currently, a manual distress survey

      method and the associated deduct point-based pavement condition rating approach are employed to monitor the

      performance of warranty pavements (maintained projects). The main objective of this study is to evaluate the

      appropriateness of using the current deduct points and distress thresholds to monitor the performance of the maintained

      projects in Mississippi. In the study, a comprehensive literature review and online survey were conducted to review the

      recent state of practice of pavement warranty in North America. The analytical section of the study employed pavement

      distress and riding quality data collected from warranty pavements and the corresponding data of non-warranty pavements

      stored in MDOT’s Pavement Management System (PMS) for the statistical analysis. Using raw data, converted deduct

      points, and composite index as performance indicators, basic statistics were developed to investigate the distribution of

      performance indicators at various service times and the corresponding percentiles associated with the existing threshold

      values. In addition, pairwise comparisons were conducted to examine the evolvement of distress over time for warranted

      and non-warranted pavements. Further, two sample t-tests were performed to compare the performance of warranted and

      non-warranted pavements at the same service time. The survey study has shown that most other pavement warranty

      programs in other states use direct measurements of pavement distresses or densities of pavement distresses for their

      distress indicators and thresholds while the pavement warranty program at MDOT employs deduct points based distress

      thresholds which are quantities converted from measurements of pavement distresses. The analytical results show that the

      performance of the warranty pavements is significantly better than that of the non-warranty pavements at the same service

      time level, and warranty pavements can maintain at high service levels for a longer time than non-warranty pavements.

      The pavement warranty program adopted by MDOT has improved pavement performance, and is effective in practice.

      However, the current distress thresholds adopted by MDOT are inconsistent with regard to the various corresponding

      percentile levels for different distress types at a same service time, and the different increase rates of the percentile level

      for different distress types over service time. It is suggested that direct measurements of pavement distresses or distress

      densities be used as distress thresholds, and consistent threshold levels be implemented for all distress types.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.21