Strength and fatigue of three glass fiber reinforced composite bridge decks with mechanical deck to stringer connections.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Strength and fatigue of three glass fiber reinforced composite bridge decks with mechanical deck to stringer connections.

Filetype[PDF-3.04 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final report.
    • Abstract:
      Replacement of the steel grating deck on the lift span of the Morrison Bridge in Portland, OR, will utilize glass

      fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) panels to address ongoing maintenance issues of the deteriorated existing deck, improve driver

      safety and introduce bridge water runoff treatment. This report outlines the testing methods and results of an experimental program

      aimed primarily at evaluating a new open cell deck. While most FRP panels are connected via shear studs that are grouted within

      isolated pockets, the panels in this case were bolted directly to the steel stringers. Two different FRP deck options were evaluated

      for comparison: one with open cells and the other with more conventional closed box extrusions. The objective was to evaluate

      the strength of the FRP to steel stringer connection with individual bolt connection tests, the strength and fatigue resistance of the

      FRP decks themselves, and the relative lateral stiffness contribution of the panels. Additional related tests were also included to

      complement the research effort such as the inclusion of tests on a closed box deck removed from the Broadway Bridge in Portland,

      OR, and strength tests of a retrofit attachment option of FRP deck to stringer using bolted clamps.

      While the monotonic, flexural, and shear strength of the deck exceeded the design values, the associated failure mode of the open

      cell panels was consistently via shear flow through the stem near the top flange. The residual displacement of failed FRP decks

      was found to be minimal, which would make visual identification of failed panels without applied load difficult in the field.

      Fatigue strength evaluation was conducted with two different protocols, where one was run to over 6 million cycles based on

      AASHTO defined loading and the other to 2 million cycles with higher than AASHTO defined loading. Fatigue failure was

      observed in only one specimen that was subjected to the higher loading condition, providing a sense of fatigue life of this

      material. Fatigue failure mode initiated in flexural fiber rupture, which was different to monotonic tests under the same loading

      configurations. Bolted deck to steel stringer connection tests indicated failure modes in the FRP with strength values that were in

      certain configurations well below the strength of the bolts. For cases where the bolted FRP deck was counted on to provide lateral

      stiffness, such as the case in the raised configuration of the bascule span, the closed cell was found to have approximately twice

      the stiffness. The results of these tests provide valuable data that can be applied to FRP bridge deck designs that utilize bolted

      connections and open and closed cell deck configurations under high traffic volumes.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26