Evaluating potential effects of widening US 64 on the black bear population of Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge, Dare County, North Carolina.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Evaluating potential effects of widening US 64 on the black bear population of Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge, Dare County, North Carolina.

Filetype[PDF-2.71 MB]

  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final report; March 15, 2009-March 31, 2012.
    • Abstract:
      This report summarizes research conducted along US Highway 64 (US 64) and US Highway 264 (US 264) in Alligator

      River National Wildlife Refuge (ARNWR), Dare County, NC regarding the proposed expansion of US 64. The study site

      included the areas adjacent to US 64 from the Alligator River Bridge to the US 64/US 264 intersection and from Cub Road to

      Borrow Pit Road on US 264. This report evaluates potential effects of the road improvement project on the black bear

      population, delineates significant wildlife crossing areas, and provides data on movement patterns and population dynamics of

      black bears on ARNWR. The primary focus of the research was to identify sites along US 64, frequently used by black bears

      and white-tailed deer as potential sites for wildlife crossing structures.

      It is the legal obligation of the US Fish and Wildlife Service to conduct a Compatibility Determination to decide whether the

      proposed project is compatible with the purpose of the refuge. Thus we evaluated the current wildlife use patterns surrounding

      the highway and the potential short- and long-term effects of the expansion project on the entire suite of wildlife occupying the

      areas directly adjacent to US 64. We employed a variety of research methods including; roadside barbed wire hair collection,

      GPS collar deployments, remote camera trapping, road kill surveys, and driving surveys.

      The road side barbed wire surveys documented 890 black bear road crossings from March 2009 – March 2011. 83

      individual bears (65M:18F) were genetically identified from hair samples collected. GPS collars were deployed on 49

      individual bears (26M:23F) and detailed 15 bears (11M:4F) crossing US 64, 99 times. The GPS collars also detailed intense

      use of the areas directly adjacent to US 64. We photo-captured 170 white-tailed deer, > 200 bobcats and raccoons and an

      additional 260 black bears at 12 guard rail openings along US 64 from June 2009 – March 2011. Driving surveys provided

      additional 3 and 19 sightings of black bears and white-tailed deer respectively from March 2009 – March 2010. We identified

      184 individual bears (132M:52F) within the study area.

      Road kill surveys documented 8 white-tailed deer (2M:3F:3U) road mortalities from November 2008 – July 2011. Including

      historical data collected by the USFWS, the cumulative total of road killed black bears on US 64 from January 1993 – July

      2011 was 63 (35M:20F:8U: =3.32/year). Road kill data also included; 75 bats (7 species, 1 species a NC Threatened Species),

      82 small mammals (9 species), 134 mid-sized mammals (10 species), 1,153 birds (66 species), 4,014 reptiles (44 species), and

      7,498 amphibians (18 species). Four species recovered in our surveys were NC Species of Concern.

      This study identified 6 high priority areas for black bear and white-tailed deer crossing and an extensive network of crossing

      areas for small mammals, reptiles, and amphibians.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.24