Subgrade characterization for highway pavement design.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Subgrade characterization for highway pavement design.

Filetype[PDF-3.70 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final; Jan. 26, 1999-Dec. 31, 2000.
    • Abstract:
      Subgrade soil characterization expressed in terms of Resilient Modulus (MR) has become crucial for pavement design. For a new design, MR

      values are generally obtained by conducting repeated triaxial tests on reconstituted/undisturbed cylindrical specimens. Because of the

      complexities encountered with the test, in-situ tests would be desirable, if reliable correlation can be established. In evaluating existing

      pavements for rehabilitation selection, subgrade characterization is even more complex. The main focus of this study is to determine subgrade

      MR employing a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), especially the automated version. In support of the study, side-by-side Falling Weight

      Deflectometer tests are also conducted.

      Twelve as-built test sections reflecting typical subgrade soil materials of Mississippi are selected and tested with DCP and FWD before and after

      pavement construction. Undisturbed samples are extracted using a Shelby tube, and tested in repeated triaxial machine for MR. Other routine

      laboratory tests are conducted to determine physical properties of the soil. In analyzing the data, the soils tested are categorized into two groups,

      fine-and coarse-grain soils.

      DCP results (DCP index, penetration/blow) from tests conducted directly in the prepared subgrade are employed to develop regression models

      for laboratory MR prediction. The predictability of the model is substantiated by repeating DCP tests at an independent site. Models for in-situ

      modulus prediction are also developed in the study. Deflection measurements facilitated the calculation of in-situ modulus, for which three

      programs were used: MODULUS 5, FWDSOIL and UMPED. The MODULUS 5 –backcalculated subgrade modulus shows good agreement

      with the laboratory MR. The FWDSOIL backcalculation program predicts subgrade moduli which are slightly lower than the laboratory MR.

      With emplacement of pavement structure (lime treated subgrade, lime fly ash subbase, and several inches of asphalt concrete) atop the subgrade,

      the subgrade backcalculated moduli are enhanced, coarse-grain soil showing a larger increase than the fine-grain soil. This latter result, namely

      the enhancement of subgrade moduli, is substantiated employing the data compiled from 20 LTPP pavement sections in Mississippi. In order to

      analyze the automated DCP results, a software designated Dynamic Cone Penetrometer ANaylsis (DCPAN), has been developed. With the

      regression equation incorporated in the software, real time laboratory as well as backcalculated subgrade modulus calculations are plausible in

      the field.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26