Subgrade characterization for highway pavement design.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Subgrade characterization for highway pavement design.

Filetype[PDF-3.70 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Final; Jan. 26, 1999-Dec. 31, 2000.
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Subgrade soil characterization expressed in terms of Resilient Modulus (MR) has become crucial for pavement design. For a new design, MR

    values are generally obtained by conducting repeated triaxial tests on reconstituted/undisturbed cylindrical specimens. Because of the

    complexities encountered with the test, in-situ tests would be desirable, if reliable correlation can be established. In evaluating existing

    pavements for rehabilitation selection, subgrade characterization is even more complex. The main focus of this study is to determine subgrade

    MR employing a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), especially the automated version. In support of the study, side-by-side Falling Weight

    Deflectometer tests are also conducted.

    Twelve as-built test sections reflecting typical subgrade soil materials of Mississippi are selected and tested with DCP and FWD before and after

    pavement construction. Undisturbed samples are extracted using a Shelby tube, and tested in repeated triaxial machine for MR. Other routine

    laboratory tests are conducted to determine physical properties of the soil. In analyzing the data, the soils tested are categorized into two groups,

    fine-and coarse-grain soils.

    DCP results (DCP index, penetration/blow) from tests conducted directly in the prepared subgrade are employed to develop regression models

    for laboratory MR prediction. The predictability of the model is substantiated by repeating DCP tests at an independent site. Models for in-situ

    modulus prediction are also developed in the study. Deflection measurements facilitated the calculation of in-situ modulus, for which three

    programs were used: MODULUS 5, FWDSOIL and UMPED. The MODULUS 5 –backcalculated subgrade modulus shows good agreement

    with the laboratory MR. The FWDSOIL backcalculation program predicts subgrade moduli which are slightly lower than the laboratory MR.

    With emplacement of pavement structure (lime treated subgrade, lime fly ash subbase, and several inches of asphalt concrete) atop the subgrade,

    the subgrade backcalculated moduli are enhanced, coarse-grain soil showing a larger increase than the fine-grain soil. This latter result, namely

    the enhancement of subgrade moduli, is substantiated employing the data compiled from 20 LTPP pavement sections in Mississippi. In order to

    analyze the automated DCP results, a software designated Dynamic Cone Penetrometer ANaylsis (DCPAN), has been developed. With the

    regression equation incorporated in the software, real time laboratory as well as backcalculated subgrade modulus calculations are plausible in

    the field.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov