United States Department of Transportation
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners.
As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
[PDF-2.98 MB]
Details:
-
Alternative Title:Joint Transportation Research Program : Civil Engineering
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Edition:Final report.
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:Hydraulic design often tends to be on a conservative side for safety reasons. Hydraulic structures are
typically oversized with the goal being reduced future maintenance costs, and to reduce the risk of
property owner complaints. This approach leads to a conservative design with higher construction
costs. Therefore, there is a need to quantify the cost-benefit aspect of this conservative approach.
Accordingly, the overall objective of this project is to compare hydraulic design policies of Indiana
Department of Transportation (INDOT) with that of other states, and perform cost-benefit analysis of
large versus smaller hydraulic structures in terms of capital and maintenance costs. Comparison of
INDOT’s culvert design is similar to that of Michigan, and is most updated compared to Ohio, Illinois
and Kentucky. INDOT uses Q100 as the design discharge, which is conservative compared to other
neighboring states that use Q50 as the design discharge for designing culverts. By using the data from 16
culvert design examples including both new-alignment and replacement structures, cost benefit analysis
is performed in the light of suggested revision in culvert hydraulics policy. Results show that an
increase in backwater limit to 1’ will result in 44% reduction in culvert size (represented as culvert area)
with an average backwater of 0.79’. Increase in backwater limit will also increase the outlet velocity by
72% that may result into extra cost in outlet protection structures. Depending on the type and the size of
the culvert, a change in hydraulic policy may result in saving from 12 -58% of the original cost
associated with the current conservative design.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
