Analysis of change orders in geotechnical engineering work at INDOT.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Analysis of change orders in geotechnical engineering work at INDOT.

Filetype[PDF-10.59 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
English

Details:

  • Alternative Title:
    Joint Transportation Research Program : Civil Engineering
  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Change orders represent a cost to the State and to tax payers that is real and often extremely large because contractors tend to charge very large

    amounts to any additional work that deviates from the work that was originally planned. Therefore, efforts must be made to reduce significantly the occurrence

    of change orders in order to provide significant cost savings to the state of Indiana and save taxpayer dollars. The proposed research, in this context, developed

    a set of guidelines that will allow the geotechnical office of the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) to minimize the probabilities of having change

    orders in those projects where they are truly preventable. These guidelines include not only recommendations on how to manage the problem of change orders

    associated with the geotechnical construction projects when they are unavoidable but also general recommendations wherever possible for adequate site

    investigation, design procedures, and quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) processes that could help minimize change orders.

    Based on the analysis conducted on the data collected from 300 INDOT contracts, it was found that the average geotechnical change order amount per

    district per year was 1.34 percent of the total estimated construction cost per district per year. The average geotechnical change order amount per district per

    year was 10.25 percent of the average amount of total change orders per district per year. The average net overrun due to geotechnical change orders was

    $707,000 per district per year. About 28 percent (84 contracts) of the contracts that were considered in this study experienced geotechnical change orders. In

    total, 158 geotechnical change orders were recorded in all the contracts. About 41 % of the total road contracts (155 contracts) experienced geotechnical

    change orders. About 37% of the total bridge contracts (44 contracts) experienced geotechnical change orders. The other contract types of this study’s dataset

    were insignificant as far as geotechnical change orders were concerned. Reason code 206 – Constructability: Soils-Related – was assigned to 101 geotechnical

    change orders. Reason code 405 – Changed Field Conditions: Soils-Related – was assigned to 46 geotechnical change orders. Reason code 108 – Errors and

    Omissions: Soils-Related – was assigned to the 11 remaining geotechnical change orders. INDOT personnel who were interviewed acknowledged the fact that

    the variability of soil is so great that it would be literally impossible to eliminate geotechnical change orders. However, they did recognize the need to address

    the following issues that lead to geotechnical change orders (i) Failure to identify areas of poor subgrade soil (ii) Mismatch in piling quantities (iii) Omissions

    and constructability issues associated with erosion control work.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov